M E
T
A
p
II Y S
J
e
S.
193
ncé\:on or inconCiOencc
Wilh
otller limpie
id~aJ
\\ hore
Luioos of
¡QUII,
ir is an hard m:litter to teJl when
We
are
Ir
r oexill rnce ""ith thcm ","c would
¡nforOl
ourlel\fcs about. ¡he end of (ueh
dlCcovcrics.
T hey that are ignorant of
Thcfe
111~aJ
belng Jikcwirc, for the mon pare,
ftcond.J rJ a/gt'bra,
cannOl
imagine (he
wondc:rs
in this kind that
9"(1/itio .
whlch
eep'!nd
upon the
p:
¡mm)
qua!iucs
are to be done
by
i1
j
and what
{an her
improvcments
of thelr minute or
in'~ nCible
parts, or 00 (omething yet and helps advantagepus to other paru of knowledge
lhe
more remote: (ro01 our
comprchcnfion.
i1 is
impoffil>le
\Ve f;¡gacious
mind 'Of
man may yet
lind
out,
it
¡,
nOl eafy
lhould knuw
whlch h:4vC
a
nccdhry
union or incvnfiUency to
clcccrmine.
'"rhe
id~al
of
t¡uan/¡I.!
are
DOl
thoCe alone:
one u.,j,h itoother, {¡nce \Ve kno\V nOl the rOOI fro m whence th:lt are capable of demontlration and
kno\Vl~dge;
other.
lhey rpnor.. or lhc tizc, tigu re. and texcure of pans on and perh.•ps more ureful pu ts of conlempbtion, \Vould
which ,hey depend, ;\oel from which lhey rerult.
undoubtedly afford us cen ainty, ifvices , paffians, and do-
Herides this, thC' re
is no
di/cover:'1b1:
c"l/n~f1i'm
betweco mineering interen, did
nOl
opppfc or mcnace endcavours
oC
I Oy
[er01Ida,y
qll~llty,
aod lhofe
prillJar.!
qUilJWCS that it lhis kind
de pcods
00 ,
\ Ve are fo fa r from knowing what figure,
Theidea
ofa
S uprmuDeing,
iofinite
iD
power J good .
lil.c,
or motion produces (for intlrtn-.:e) a )'td/'YI.u
rO/(Jttr,
or nefs , and wiCdom, whofe workmanllllp wc are, and on
! l1.l·tellajle,
or
afhtlrp found,
thJ.t \Ve can by no me"ns whom we depend ; and the
id(a
o(
ourfo'vu,
as under–
c:onccive how
anyji=e, figure,
or
""Iioll
C10
rofTib1y pro· Chnding rational,cre:ltures; would, ir duely confidered,
duce in us the
idea
of any
colour, lafie,
or
¡oulld
wh~t·
afTord ruch foundations of our
dul)' ,
and
ruIn of a{liol1.
foever ; and there is no cooccivable connel'hon belwecn as might place
mora/il}
among (he {ciences capable of
the one and the olher.
demonC1:ration, T he relatioos of othcr Olodes may cer-
Our knou ledge therefore of eoexiflenee re. ehes liule tainly be pereeived, as
\t
ell a. thofe of number aod ex–
(anher
th~n (xperienc~,
Some {ew, indeed, of (he
pri-
tcnfion.
IVhere Ihere
;1
no propull. /h4re h
no
injuf–
mnry
qu:allties have a necdr."y dependence :and vjCiblc coo-
tia,
is
Jo
propofition as ceflain as aay demonClratioQ iD
neéhon one wilh another; as
figu re
nccdran ly {uppofel
Euclid:
for the
idea
o(
propulJ
being a right tO any
exte'!fiollJ rtt'dviflg or conllltunic'I!illg mo/ion hJ illlPu/ft
tbin g; and the
idea
of
illjujJict,
bein~
lhe ¡ovarion or
fUppOlcs
JolidilJ .
But qualiues coexillent tn aoy fub..
viol:uioo of {hal right ; it is evident, that there
¡dral
bcing
jeét,
witholtt Ihis depcndeoce and conneétion, cannot
cer~
thus ellablirhed. and tbefe names annexed to them. we
COlO
lainly be koo\Yn tO coexill any (arther than experience by
2S
certainly know tbis proporidon to be true, as that a
our fcofes inforOls us . Thus , Ihollgh upon tri ..1wc fi od
IriaJ/gle
h.zl/hru alJglel et¡ual lo l'tuo righl onu.
A–
goldyellow,
welgltty. mall••ble. t.fible, and 6xed, yet gain,
Nogov<rnmml allowJ IIhfolrl l<IibuIJ.
The
id<"
beeaufc none of thefe have any evident dept ndence or ne- of
g.vumRml
being the eflablilhment of foeiety upon
ceffary conneBien wit h che other, we cannoe certainly cen ain rules or 1aws \\Ihich require cooformiry to them,
k now that \Vhe,e any
four
of thefe are, the
ffth
will be anC! the
id<a
of
a6lolul< libu lJ
~ .ing
fo , aay ooe
t~
do
Ihero alfo. how highl ), probAble foever it may be: BUI \Vhatever he pleaf .., we are as eap.ble ofb eing eer..iDof
rbe higheCl degree of
pr06nhili/y
aOlounts not tO
cer/ai,,·
the truth of chis propoCition, as of any
iD
11IalhunalicAI.
IJ ;
without whieh there can be no \rue koo\Vled¡:e: F'or
'Vhat has given the adv.n..ge to the
id,aJ
of
f ualil"
this coexillence can be no runherknown, (han it is percei- and made them thougbt more capable
oE
certainty aDd de–
Y~d;
and it canoot he perceived, but ei chef. in
parlicu-
monOration, is,
lar
fubjdls, by the obfervation of our fcnres, or, in
FirJl.
T hat they can be reprefe oted by feoGble marko
x eneral,
by the ncce(filry conneélion of the
ideal
th.:m· which have a nearer correrpondc:nce wilh them thlD aoy
felves.
words or found s.
lJiagraf/1J
dr...wn on paper are copies
As
[O
incomparihilily,
or
repugnanc", lo
c"e.'(iJ1(11c~.
We o( lhe
ideal,
dnd not fiable
te
the uncertainty thar words
may kno-v ,ha, any fubj ea can hae of
e.ehfOr! of
pri·
e.rry in their figni6eatioo : But \Ve have nofenfible mark.
tnary
qualities bUl one panirular
a l
once, one extenfioo, chat refemble
OUT
moral ¡de " ,
and nothing but words to
one fi¡¡ure ; and fo of fenfible
id aJ,
peculiar to eaeh ex pref. them by; wbieh though wheo wriu eo they re–
renfe: fo, whatever of eaeh kind is pref<ot in any fub · main the fame, yet the
id'OJ
they fl and fo , may ehange
jefl,
excludes all other of ,hat fon; for ¡nfhoce, ane in the Came man i and ir is very fcldoOllbat they are not
rubjca eaonot have
Iw o
1111<111
or
Iwo colourJ
at the fame different in difft,cOl perfon•.
time.
S"Dlldlj,
M oral id,aJ
are eommonly more eomplelC
A, to
pf>'Werl
of
lu6j1ar.cn,
which
m~ke
a great pan than figures, ' Vhence theCe two
iocoovcnien~es
roll,ow:
of our inquiries about them, aod are no inconriderable
FirjJ,
rhat their names are or more uncertaln ligOlfica.
branch of Ollr knowledge ; our knowl<dge
al
to thefe !ion ; the preeife eolleaion of fimple
id<trl
.hey
fl~nd
for
r..ehe. Jiule fa rther than
,,:/,uimu;
bec.ufe they eoo· no' being fo eafily agreed on, and fo the fign that
t5
ur. d
{in
in a texture and O1otion of P¡¡rtS whlch we cannot ror them in cOnlOlunicatioD alwaysJ and in thioking ofteo,
by any melnscome todifco\·er.
Ext~ri~l1u
is that which docs
DOI
Cleadily carry u·itbÜ tht {"Ole
itlra, Srcondly.
in this
PUt
we muO
dep~nd
00;
and
il
were tO be wilhed
1~he
mind COlonot e¡¡{ily retain thofe
pr~cire.:
combinó\tioDs
lhal
il
were more improved.
fa exaélly aod perfeétly as is
nececr.uy;i.n the.: exaruioa-
As tO the Ihird
COrt,
the
agrun:en/ or li¡flgru rlu1/ o/
tion of the habitudes and correfpondeDclcS,
agr~emeDts
ellr ,Jellf in
nn.10'),~r r~/Jli()n,
this is lhe
largd~
lieldof or difa"re:ementsof fe ....er.u ofthem one with another, c·
koowled¡:e••nd il
t5
h.rdto determin.t how fM it may fpceiali
y "
here it is tO be judged off by long deduélions.
<"tend. Tbis par! dl pcnding
00
our fagaeity in /indiog and the illtervention of fevenl other eomplex
id,aJ,
to
io
\crmedi.nc;'/(01
that may Olew tbc habil"Jdes 2nd re- (hew the a" reCment
oc
diCagree:meot of t\Vo remate: ones.
OL .
111.
ul!lb.
77.
2
3
e
t
N ow