G
:A
Cannot ad",it of
~ny
fex
~t
.1:
j
thercfore all the
b~in~I
which C"n
b~cnl\le
,he ohjelh of
O~ r
f¡>ccllla,ion, m"y be
conGdercd as ci,her
11/01",
or¡ ,m"/" .
or
(uch as
~dmit
of
n.
(ex, and therefore may be fald lO be oeuter, or of
mi/A" fex. Ileoce, therefore,
grammari~ns
have made
a
threefold difli oction o( nouns,
i~to
1II."¡;:u/ine
gO/lI,rJ,
(Jr1ho(e \' ..hich deoOle
IIInl,,; ¡",inil/',
ur lhofe which
denote
.frlllolN
j
and
mu:trJ,
"hich denote tho(e fub·
ihoces tllJt admit of no (' x. But,
~hhoubh
the origin
of genders is thus (o clear and obvious; yet every lan·
guage that \Ve kno\V of, except the EngllOl , deviates from
the order of nature, and ollen amibutes fex to tho(e (ub·
lIances which are totally incapable of any; flay, (ome
Iangu:r;:es are (o particularly defeé!ive in this relpeé!, as
to cI.(s every objeé! inanimate as well as
.nil\l~te
under
either the
maj:'ulim
or
fclllinin:
gmdm,
·as they admit
of no gcnder (or thofe that are of oeitller (ex. This is
the cafe " ith the French, Italian, and SpaniOl. But the
Engl'¡h, firié!lyfollowiog the order of nature, put, every
Doun \Vhich denolcs a male aoimal, and 00 others, in the
,,,a¡culi/Je
gender
j
every name 01 a female animal, in the
¡,minine;
and everyanimal\Vhofe (ex is not obviou" or
known, as \Vell as e.ery inanimate objea whatever, io
(he
n,ul"
geoder. Nor does this rule admit of aoy ex·
ceptions; ahhotlgh poetS take the liben y of perfooifying
.ny objeas they lhir.k proper, aod endow them with
whatever fex fuils their purpofe befi
j
\Vhich (erves ad.
mirably to diflioguilh betweeo the coollaoguage of phi.
lofophy, aod the eothufiafm of poetry.
Although
Cafu
are oot oece(fary accidents of oouns:
yet as they hage been often cooGdered as (uch, it \ViII
perhaps be deemcd proper to take fome ootiee of them:
-As oatural objeé!s .remain the fame , ahhough vie\Ved
from maoy difl'erent poiots of view, they are oot io their
own oature altered, although they may beconnetled with
others in many di(fuent ways: their oames therefore
ought tOremain uochanged, although their relations · to
other 1V0rds may be varied.
However,
there arecertain
circumfhoces io ",hich oouos may be cooGdered with re·
[peé! tO their relatioo
lo,
aod eoooeé!ion
,ui/h
o~her
words,
which occur more frequeotly thao others. Some langua.
ges. (particul. rly the Greek and Latin) expre(s
fome-of
thefe Clrcumnances, by
a
variaiion of the origin.1 nouo,
which variations are called CASES. But the En·
glilh, aod dmofl all the modern laogllages of Europe,
llave foll nwed the order of oamre, and al!ow the noun
to remaio the fame, expreffiog its relation and coooeaion
",ith other words by the help of dininé!\Vords ealled pre–
poGtioos.- Which of thefe methods is ben, it is not our
prefent Furpo(e to inqui le. See LA NCVAGE.
lt
I,as beco fuppof, d lhe Englilh nounl admit of one
.adatioo which
~ofwers
to the genilive cafe of the La·
tins.- T hus the 1V0rd
Aletander
is ao Eoglilh nouo in its
proper fo rmo aod in that
c.fewhich iu Latio would be
ealled the
NO/llina/ivr.
The v.riation which they cal!cd
the
Cmitivr
Cafe, i, exprc(fed io EnghOl by addlOg the
prepoGtion Of before the noun; thus, Of
Alrtalldtr
But
the fame
me.nin~
may bc
coove)'~d
by the WOIO
A/",n/! .
d,,', ;
for the mear.¡og is Ihe f.' lIle If
I
íay
the houfe
of
Alaallder,
or
¡/
/ex.nd,r'J
houfe. This,
th~reforc .
has
been ealled a
trUC
iOCltlioDof thc original nuun.
llo\V·
M
M
A
R.
evc~,
ahh?"gh this opinion has beenadopted by all gramo
mm.ns,tt appears tOhave bcen adoptcd lVithout fu!lici.
cnt Ix.mioauoo, "' IVIII be evideot Irom the follo""n'
cünliocrations.
b
'fhere are cen ain cireumnances in which this fuppofed
genilive eannOt be fuUltllled infi ead of the other : lor
I
m~y
ro,)',
1
fpeak Of
Alo,and, r
1
IVrite o
p
C40r,
1
tlllnk Of
Powp'J ;
but I cannol f,Y',
1
fpeak
A/(XaIlJ,/,'s,
1
IVrite
Cefar's,
or [ thir,k
PCII/pe)
's. Hence the(e tillO
are not io all cab fynooymous ¡erms; and therefore one
of IhemIl1Iln be conGdered as ooly aceidentally eoinc'¿lng
lVith the other in partieul. r c¡rcumfiancCl.
Ag.io, evayone of thefe I,ippofcd geoitives can wilh
prop,iety ,(fume all the vmeus figos of the d,fl'lren¡
ca!"
io the Engllfh language: for \Ve may f.y Gmpl)', as
10
theoomioative cale,
Alu.llder's
houf.
j
but \Ve can airo
fay, Of
¡¡lexander',
ho.!e,
TO. IVITH, HOM, IN,
BY,
or fO R
AI,xand,,', he.!e,
&c.
Jf
thi! then be a
mi
genitive, it requi res the Ggn of the genitive, as ",ell
3!
of the other cafes, to explalO it; whieh \Vould be an abo
furdlty too breat tObe admitted.-Hut it may be afked,
if thefe are OOt geoitives, to \Vhat clafs of words caD tbey
be referred
1
[O anfwer to this, it has been already obferved, that
the variety of (ubfiaoces is fo great, that it is impoffible
for any perfon to know the names of every one of them ;
and therefore tbey have been arranged under the feveral
orders of genera and fpecies. We oow funher obfer.e,
that as the individuals are fo exceedio'gly numerous, it
would be impoflible even tO iovent proper names for cach,
Ind far lefs would it be poffible lO make thefe names be
known to every perfoo
\Vho
might accidentally fee them :
therefore ",heo \Ve \Vlnt to afcertain aoy individual ob·
jea, and difiioguilh it from all the other individuals
of
the fame fpecies, \Ve are obliged to ha.e recourfe tO par–
ticular epithets, or definitives, to afcertain that individo.
ar.-Thus, [ fee a particular houfe which
1
\Vant to di·
fiioguiOI from other houf.s
j
this has no particular oame
of its owo
j
1
mul! therefore afcertain it in tbe befl mano
·oer
1
can
j
aod as tbe Ihonefi is alIVays the bell, we Olofi
naturally deoomioate it from iu owner or po(fe(for if \lÍe
know him, and therefore cal! it
!I/
,xa.du's , Jal1m'!,
or
John's
houfe.-Hcre theo
\Ve
(ee, that the words
A·
lexander's , Jnmn's,
and
].oh,,'s,
do not nand as oouO!,
but as
arlie/o
or
d<JiIl!1 iva
ferl'iog tOafcenain aod point
out the indiviouallt)' of the ooun with whicb they are
joined, and are much oearer al!ied to adjcaives than
10
[ubfi.oti'·es. The(e, therefore, like OIher anicles, do
OOt alter the cafe of the ooun ; fo that tite term
AI,tan'
a,,',
houje,
is as much the proper name of a pallicubr
boufe, as
Alaalld"
or
J""IO
are the proper names of
particular men . and of confequence may be varied thro'
the ddrerent cafes as ",el! as the otl¡er.- It is
furprir.n~,
that this idea
oever
oeellrrcd to r.rammarians; for
SI
Pet,r'J
at Rome, and
SI
Pa. !'J
at Loooon, are as Irul)'
the proper names 01' ¡h& tIVO
oobl~
cdifices , as the
Rr·
IlIndo
or the
Cimll
are thc proper r.amcs or til'O other
flruclures.-We o"y therefole
'ard)'
c"Delude, thal ¡he
EngliOl I. ngu.'ge adlllits of 00 cafes
.H
al!, ano Ih.1t lite
only dr, r.liJI accidents
01'
nouns are gend" and ollmber.
SECo