L
o
Bllllhingl (qlla/lo
ol/~
and
Ih~
fa nu Ihing, araqual
lo
(JIU
anolhu;
nmfon alfo
Ib1~
trial/glo ,
&c.
an
~qua/
hetwwl
Ihanfilvr~.
T his obfervation will befound to hold inall
inl/ludia/~
canf flunw
whatfoever, infomuch that they are in faa
DO
more than
enlh)'lhahU
of hypothetical fyllogifrns.
But then it is particular to them, that the ground on
which the concllllionrells, namely, its coherence with the
",il/or,
is of itfelf apparent, and ieeo immedlately tofiow
fromthe rules an,1reafons of logic.
The next fpecies of reafoning wc Ihall take notice of
iJ what is kno\\ n by the name of a
forilo .
This is a
way of arguing, in which a great number of propolitions
are fo linked together, th. t the predicate of one hecomes
continually the fubjea of Ihe nexI following unlil al lall
a conclulioo is formed, by briDging tOgether lhe fubjel!
of Ihe fi r(l propolilion, and Ihe predicaleof Ihe \an. Of
Ihis kind 'is Ihe following orgument.
Cad /¡ omnip.,m,.
An omnipolwl h,ing can doeverJ Ihing p.JJih/e.
H,
Ihal can do everJ thillg poJJihle, call do
whatrv~r
invo/vo nol a conlradiflion.
n erifor, Cad can dowhal,vrr invo/vo
mI
a contra·
¿i{liOl/..
This particular combination of propolitions, may be
continued to any length we pleafe, without in Ihe leafl
",eakening the ground upon which the conclufion rens.
TIe reaCon is, becaufe the
[orito
itfel f may be reColved
ioto as Qlany fJ mple Cyllogi(ms as Ihere are middle terms
in it
i
where Ihis is found univerCally to hold, that when
fuch a reColution is made, and the Cyllogifms are placed
in train, Ihe concluGon of the la(l io the feries is alfo
the conclulion of the
foriw .
This kind of argument
thmfore, as it ferves 10 unite fevera l fyllogifms into
one, mu(l fland upon Ihe fame foundation wilh the fyllo·
gifms of which it confifls, and is indeed, properly
Cp~ak
'ing, no other than a compendious way of reafoning fyl.
Jogiflically.
What is here faid of plain limpie propoli ,ions, may be
as well applted to (hofe llu t are condidonal
i
that is, any
numbrr of them may be
Co
joined together in a feries,
that the conCequent of one (hall become continually the
anteadent of Ihe nexl following; in whicbcafe, byefla·
blilhing the antecedent of thefirll propolitioo, \Vee(labliOI
Ihe conCeqocot of Ihe laO. or, by reOloviog lhe I. n con
Ce·
qu~nt.
remove alfo lhe fi rn anlecedent. This way of
reafoning is exemplilied in the following
arguOl~ot .
lf"'elove an) perfoll,
011
el/l,tionl oj hatred toward,
hil/l erafi.
1/
all e1J/oliMI
01
hatrrd I.,unrdl
a
pufon ((Ofi,
W4
con/MIrej,ice
;11
hi,
miJforlulICJ.
If
'Jle rrj,iCt' mI in hil millorlune!, we cerlainly
"Uifo
hi1J/ IJQ injur)'.
n rref'"
if""'
love a perfoll ,
w~
"'iJli
hil" no injurJ.
It
is evideot that chis
[nritn,
as well as the \nn, may
be reC"I 'cd iOlo a Ccries of diflin(\ fyllogifms: wi,h this
"nly tliírmoce, thal here the fyllogifOlS 3re all eondi·
tioo,'\'
We come now 10 lhat kind of argumeot which logi.
d. ns caUtd llld/lflion
i
in arder 10 the ri&ht undcrflano·
G
C.
ing of whieh, it will be nccclTJry to obfme, Ihat our
geoeral ideas are for lhe 01011 part capahle of varioul
fubd,vilions. Thus the idea of lhe lowell fpet,es may
be Cubdivided inlO its fevnol iodividuols, the Idea of dny
genus ,nto the d,írorent Jpecees il cumprehends, and
Ca
of lhe rdl. If Ihen we f""pofe l!lis dillribulion 10 be
duly made, aod fo as 10
1
.ke in lhe \Vhol. extent of the
idea 10 whieh it beloogs ; theo it is piaio. th. l all the
CubdiviJions or pans of any idea
IOg~ther
conflilUte tha!
whole idca. Thus dte (cveral ind,vlduals of aoy fpecies
laken togelher eooaitule Ihe \V1.ole
fpeei~s,
and all the
various Cpecies comprehended under aoy gonus make up
Ihe whole genus. This be<og. lIowed, whatever may be
affirmed
01'
all the ¡'cm,d Cubdivilions and chlTes of any
idea, ougl1l to be alli' med of the whole general idea to
which thele fubdivilions beloog. What may be aRirmed
of all the ,nd,viduah of aoy fpecies, may be affi rmed of
Ihe . 'hole Cpecies. and what may be affi rmed of . 11 the
fpecies' of any genus may bo alfo affirmed of lhe \Vhole
genus; becaufe all lhe iodividu, ls lakeotogether are Ihe
lame with the Cpecies, and all lhe fpecies laken logelher
Ihe fame with the geous.
.
This way of arguing, where we infer tlOiverfally con–
cerniog any idea whal we had before affirmed or deoied
Ceparatel y of all its feveralfubdivilioosand parts, is call.
ed reaComog:,y
induflion.
Thus if we Cuppofe lhe whole
uibe of animals. fubdivided inlo men, bealls, birds, in–
Ceéls. Bnd fi (hes. and theo reaCoo concerning them after
Ihi, maooer :
AII
nrm h••,. p.w" ojhegillning m,li,n I
. 11 hraliJ, hirdl, . nd in/rfll, haoe .
P01J)"
oj h'gi1l1'¡ng
1J/olion ;
.1I ¡jha
hao,
•
power oj hrgillning molion
;
th"e(." all alli",./¡ h.v<
•
power
01
h'gillnillg molion :
Ihe argumcnt is an
illduflion.
When the Cubdi.ilioos
are jull, fo as 10 lake io Ihe whole geoeTdI idea, aod lhe
eoumer.tioo 's perfea , thal is, extends to . 11 aod every
of Ihe inferior c\alTes or partS; there lhe
inJI,fli' lJ
is
compleal, and the maoner of reafoning by
induflion
il
apparently conc\ufive.
The lall fpecies of CyllogiCms we (hall take notice of, is
Ihal commonly diflinguilhed by Ihe name of •
dii<mlJlo.
A
rlil,mma
is an argum¡:el, by which lOe eodeavour 10
prove the aLfurdity or falfehood of
Come
alTenion. In
order 10lhis we alTumea cooditional P;Opolilion, lhe ano
tecedent of whieh is theaírcrtion to bedifpro,ed, aodlhe
coofequeot a disjunai.e propofil ioo, enumeraliog all tite
pollible Cuppofi,ioos upoo wltich Ihal
,O~rtion
CdO
lake
place. If tlteoit appm s, Ihal all theCevm l Cupp?fitioo!
oughlolO be rejetled. il is plaio Ihal lhe antecldent or
alfertioo itfelf mufl be
Co
100. When thmfore fueh a
propolition as that before·menlionco is made tile
lIwj or
of aoy fyllogifm; ir lhe
",ilJor
rej~as
all the furpofil<ons
cont,incd in Ihe confequenl, it
folJol~s
ncccO:llily, tltat
the rooclufion OUghl to rejca Ihe an'ecedcot, whlch, as
we have r.,id, is the very aírallon
10
he dil'proved. Tltis
particular '"'y of uguing is that ,"hi, h 10bicialts call a
dil",,,,,,!;
aod from Ihe account herc givcn of il, it al"
pears, th;¡l
w~
may
tn
lhe geoeral delinc it 10 be
fl
~rpo.
Ihtfic?1
f;·II~~iflll.
where th,
COI//1"0'II1
of
r~~
mojor il
a diljul/{iiV( propvíliol/ , ?uhich
i,
?uh,11y
Ifl¡~1/
",un; Gr
rmrov'" il/ Ih: ",il/Gr.
Of this kiod is the follo,"II'&:
1f6'od did Ilet mate the ,v.r/d p<rFfl ill it, "i/J': ir
1/111)1