Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1019 / 1042 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1019 / 1042 Next Page
Page Background

L

o

G

Tbis is Ihe mfoh, why, ;úlderto exctl remarbbly

in .ny ooe br.neh of Icarning, it is neeeíTary to have at

lea/l

¡

general acquain!anee \Vith the whole eirele of art!

and lcien"",.

Th~

truth i9, _11 Ihe various divifiool of

human k(l()wledge are very nearly related among Ihem·

(e1'f!,

and io iMume'able io/laom ferve to illufirate and

rel

off

eaeh olhe.. And a1tho' il is nOI 10 be denied, Ihal,

by

3n obnioale applieation lO ooe buneh of tludy,

a

mao

mar make eoofKlenble p.rogref9 aod aequire fome degree

of emioenee in il; yel his vie"! \ViII be always narrOIV

and ecolraéted, and he will waol Ihat ma/lerly difeern·

menl, IVhieh nOI ooly eoables us 10 purfue our difeove·

ries ",ilh eafe, bUI alfo, in hying Ihem opéo to other!, la

fpread a mlai. brighlnef! around IheOl. But when

ou~

reafoning

reg.Ni!

a particular feieaee, il is farther neeef·

fary, Ihu we

mor~

oearly aequaiot ourfehes Wilh "hal'

eycr rel.ttl 10 Ihal ·feietlCe. A general knowledge is

a

good prepmlioD, and enables us lO proeeed with eafe

and

e~pedition',

in whatever braneh of learning we apply

ID.

B

ut lbenin Ihe mi.ute and iotricale qudtioDSof any

fcie.ee

\Ve are by no meROS qualified 10 mfos wilh

ad,aoll

ge, uDtil we hne perfeélly manered Ihe feieoee

10

whieh Ihey belons.

We come DOW lO the feeond thing requircd, in order

to

a

fumfsful progrer. in reafoning, oamely, Ihe !kili

t nd lalenl of applying iOlermedim ideas happily in all

putieular ionaoees Ihal eomeunder eoofideratioo. Ufe aod

nercife

m

Ihe be/l innruétors io Ihe prefent eafe. Aod

,herefore the Irue way 10 aequire this taleol is, by being

1Ilueheon.edaD! in tho(e (eiences where the arl ofreafooiog

i, allowed lO ,eigo in tbe greate/l perfeétioo. Henee it IVas

Ihlt Ihe ancienl!. who (o well underfiood the manner of

forming tbe mind, a1ways begao \Vilh

malhemali.kl.as

Ihe foundation of their philofophical /l

ijdies. Her.

the

~Dderltanding

is

by

degrees habituated 10 truth, eon–

mas inCenfibly a eertaio foodoe(s (or it, and learns oever

to yield il! arreot 10 any propofitioo, bUI where the eri·

deoee is fuffieient 10 produce full eooviétion. For Ihis

r~ron Pla/~

has ealled mathemalieal

Jemoonrati~ns

the

ealharl;cll

or purgatives o( Ihe Coul, as beiog Ihe pro·

'pcr

m~os

to citarle il from error, and .ellOl'e Ihat na·

tural exereue of il! faeuhies,

~

wbieh ju/l Ihiokiog con

Ms.

If thmrore we 1V0uld form our mind, to

a

babil of

rcafoniog c10fely and in train, we cannol take aoy more

e~min

melhod, th.o the exereifing ourCelv., in. mathe·

mllical demonnmions, fo

as

10 eonmét

a

kir.d of fami·

liarity Wilh them. Not Ihat IVe look upoo it al ne·

ceíTary Ihal all men lhould be deep malhematieians, but

that, ha.ing got the lIay of ,eafooing whieh Ihu nudy

nectrrari ly briogs lhe mind 10, theymay be able to traoC·

rer il to olher parts of koowledge, as

th~y

lhall have oc·

cafion.

'

'RuI although Ihe fiudy of malhematieks be of all o·

Ihers lhe mon ufdul 10 form Ihe mind, aod gi.e it

10

mly relilh of trulh, yet ough! not olher patl! of philo·

fophy In be oegleéted. For Ihere alfo IVe mcet lVilh

many oppOrtUnilies of excrcifing the pOIVm

01'

the uo·

dcrfianding : aod the variety offubjcéls oalllrally leads us

lO obCen·. alllhofe difl'crent lurns of Ihioking Ihat are

peculiarly adapled to¡he fevml idm 'ye e¡¡¡¡mine aod

c.

993

Ihe trulhs \Ve (eareh a(ler. For Ihis purpofe, befides Ihe

I\udy of malhemalickl, IVe ollghl to apply ourCél,e. di·

hgendy to the re2.ding of fueh ,ulhors as have diUin–

guilhed thcmfellcs for Ilrenglh of reaConing, aod a joll

aDd aeeurate maooer or Ihinkiog. F,'r- it is obrervable,

Ihat a miDd excreiled aod feafoned tot,uth, reldom refi,

fatisfied ioabarecontemplation of the

argu~nls

olfered

by Olhers, bm will be frequentlyeíT.yiog ils owo nrenglh,

and purfuing ilS diCeo.eries upon Ihe plao it i$mon " .

cu/lomed

10.

Thus

u-e

iofeolibly

euou.ét

a habit of tra–

cing trutbfrom or,e /lage to anolh

er, aod o

fiovenigatiog

thole general rdatioos aod prop"liei, whieh we after–

IVards aferibe 10 particular ihings,

accordi~g

as we fi04

them eomp"heqded uncer

I~e

abnraél idm 10 whieh

Ihe properties beloog.

O[

¡he for/JII

o/

S)'¡¡oglfn/l.

HI THUTOwe naYe eonlentedourfelves wilh a geoe·

ral nOlioo of fyllogifms, and of Ihe pans of whieh lhey

~onfin.

It

.is now time

I~

cnler al'lde more partieul?r1y

lotO the

fubJe~,

to ex.mloe Iheir various forms, and lay

opeo Ihe rules of argumentatiOA prop" 10 each.

In the

fyllog!fms ment.ioned io, IVe

~ay

oblerve, thal the

miqdle

t~m,

II the fubJel:l of the

nlaJor

propoJilioo, and Ihe pre.

dlcate of Ihe

minoro

Thi, difpofition, though Ihe moq

oatural aod obvi.oUI, is nOI howe'er neeeíTary;

ji

fre.

9

uend y happenmog, that the

middl, term

is the fubjea

'?

both .the preOlitres, o, the prediealeio bOlb; and fome.

time! dueétly cootrary, the predieate io Ihe

nlajor,

aod

Ihe

fu~jeét

in

~he m~n.,.

Henee Ihe diflioélioo of (yllo.

glfms ,oto vanous klOds, ealled

Igum

by logieians.

Fot

Igore,

aeeordin~

ta their ufe of the 1V0rd, is nOlhioge/fe

bUI the order and difpofil ion of Ihe

middl,

Imh

io any

frllogifm. Aod as Ihis difpofition is fourfold, fo Ihe

fi.

gures of fyllogifms theoee ariliog are four in number.

W.~en

the

midd/e

¡e~m

is Ihe fubjel:l of Ihe

mojor

propo.

fiuoo , and Ihe predlCale cf the

,ninor,

IVe ha,e what is

caUed lhe

¡rJl figu re.

If, on the olher hand, it is Ihe'

predicate of bOlh the premiíTes, Ihe fyllogifm i,-raid to be

in the

ficond fig ure.

Agaio, io Ihe

Ihird IgUrt,

Ihe

I.iddle ¡erm

is the fubjeélof Ihe tl\'O

premiíT~s.

And

lafily, by making it the predieale of the

mojor,

and

Cubjeét of lhe

minor,

we obtaia fyllogifms io Ihe

[ourth

Ic

ure •

But befides this fourfold difiinétionof fyllogifms, Ihere

js alfo a fanher fubdivifioo of them in eyery figure, ario

fing from

Ih~

qUJnlil).and qua/il),

as they are ealled, of

the propofiliQns. By

quanlil)

"e meao

th~

eonfideration

of propofitions as uni,erfal or panicular;

by

9,/a/il)',

~s

aflirrpative or mgati.e. NolV al,

in

alllhe feveral di(po.

fitions of Ihe

m

idd/e I"/JI,

Ihepropofition of "hieh

a

fyl.

logifm

eonr.ns

may

~e

either univHfal or particular.

.ffirma

live or

Qegalive; the due dmrmioOlion of thefe,

~nd

fo puning Ihcm logether as Ihe

lall s

of ar

gumen

ta·

tion require, eOonilule IVhat logiei"ns

c¡,1I

tl¡e

lIto.dl

oC

fyllogirDls.

Of

Ihefe

11Jcodi

there,re adelermin

ate nu

mo

ber 10 mry figure, ioeludíng all

the pullihle ways in

whieh propofilions dill'cring in

9/1anl//)

or

qua!tly

can be

eombined, aceordiog 10 aoy dilpufitiuo"f Ihe

middle Ima,

io order 10 mive at a jull eor.cJufion.

lhe di¡ifioo of ryllogifms mOlding 10 Olood ¡nd

fi.

gure,