Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  37 / 70 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 70 Next Page
Page Background

17

After reviewing this whole matter, tbe Society is of the opinion tbat the

decision of the Conference for

11

ph

11 ,

11

th" etc. wss tbe soundest wsy out of tbe

difficulties.

A

solution by underscore is very impractical because (1) it is

open to the tendency to drcp diacritics in handwriting, (2) no printer can

insertan underscore under single letters easily, for no such character

is~

provided in standard fonts and would bave to be cut piece by piece from lengths

of

11

rule

11 ;

the apace talmn

by

an insertad underacore would heve to be com–

pensated for under lettars where

1t

did not occur, by inserting tbin "leads

11

sgain cut to varying lengths; (3) slmost no fonts in sny language carry letters

cast with incorporsted underscores.

Italicis is possible but difficult:

(l) msny fonts do not havo itslic lettars: many printers carry italics only for

a very few fonto; (2) the educational system would bave to provide a distinc–

tive method of wri ting the lettar or itslicis would tend to disappear in

handwritten text. As toe raised letter es "h", this egain requires wide–

spread introduction of a letter entirely new in metallic construction to sll

but one printer in e thouesnd; while the small cap letter (a) ie lscking in

msny fonts, (b) re9.uires special determination of how it is to be successfully

handwritten and (e) introduces e deleterious typographical inconsistency (how

for example will the symbol be rendered in a line all capa or all small capa?).

The indifference of

many

ecientifi c lir.•uists to tbe optical effect in reading

of the symbols tbey choose, to the typographic quality of tbe symbol, and to

the semantic significance of the uses of cape, small cape, roman end italic

type in the social organism is unfortunate.

sh -

alveolar palatal sibilant

The introduction of a single letter for this phoneme would re–

quire a new symbol and thorefore general governiiJ3nt propagation which

is not in sight. Dr. Pike writes:

"There wos a further advantage to

"eh",

namely that this phoneme appears to be a very recent develop–

ment in Cuzco and Bolivia, starting from a conditioned variant of /s/

before certain sounds such as / k/, but the two dialects have not

adoptad it into the esme words uniformly.

Even now it is extremely

difficul t

to find any minimal pairs for easy proof of the phonemic

differentiation of

f

s/ and /

sh/.

The decision has to be reached by

the inversa use of Premisa One, that is, the elimination of conditions

which would changa /s/ t o

fabf.

Even tbis is difficult, inasmuch as

remnants of the old conditioning still remstn.

In the faca of this

inconsistent picture, the "h" being silent in Spanish causes less

interference with other dialects in which tbe sound actually should be

a simple "s" tban would a new separata symbol.

11

The possibility of using fx/ was aleo considerad on the basis of ita

successful use in soma placea in the Americes, but

it

had no support

among the missionaries because it did not have a tradition of such

valus in the Andes, and aleo beoause of tbe confused picture, just

describsd, which indiooted that a symbol too separata from

11

s

11

was not

altogether desirable.

"The dialecte of .Ancash and of Ecuador have gane further tban the

Cuzco-Bolivia pattern, eo tbet now they bBve a clear-cut,

compl~te!y

independent /ah/, used without heavy restrictions as to permitted

posit ione.

11

J - J - J

(versus h -

J -

j) initial, medial, and final velar fricativos

or their approximations.