r,¡
E T A
l'
II
quirc..\ to rorm :\
1~.:hI
jldgl·lcnf.
~r'ld
10
prC"rcn:on lhe
I"/'{.I:I
lO lhe
C' ;OL'lICt:
arod
rr o/I"hilil)'
01 Ihe dHng.
which
111lS a,,.:1 f<tlls ;:¡rcoru nr. as the (\\lO found'Hior.s of ere–
tiilihty
f;\von r
0 1"
con! r ..
,lIél
it.
Thef\! are
liJ~I :!
to ruch
t .tri.!ty of ('olllruy (\bl":ry;¡tions, circun)(iances, rc.-pons,
t::llrrrs .
Jdip.n...
ov,.'r.(j,~ht.
éc.
of rrpon crs, l!t.n
it
is
il11pJlflulc lO r('duce la prl!Clrc
rulc~
lhe ,-"nnus d,
~rccs
,',hcrcin
111(11
~¡ve
It)ci r
nJ/c-III.
'rhis
In
t::,en\!rOll
OlJy
be
{lid, dut as l he
pro'.!I,
upon
oue
ex .lOllnat lon. (h ..1I
to
; ny
O:lC
appcar in a RTcate r or kfs J t"gr('c la prcpondcr::ue
0 0 citheT fide, fa tht'Y
iH ':
(i ltcd la produce in 1he mind
fud; d tlT.:rcnt
e:lt'!rtÓ\lnmcr. u,
as are c .. JJcd
h_li~f,
COIl–
j.·n:lr~
. ..
t!,,~/i .
'tf,;ul l ,
'W."'J~rill.":.
dijJruJl,
di/b,lte/ .
s.:c.
lt
is a
r:JIt·
gt!nerall), "'rprovcd, , h
H
:\Ily
teflIIllony,
t h~
r..
nhcr off it is remo\'cJ (rom the
of
"igin.tltruth, the
I~fs
force· it hilS :
And in
/radi:io'1al
truThs, c<tch rcmo"c
we.tkens thc force o( the
preof.
Thcre
is
I
nd~
quite con–
trary to this, ad ....ilnced by fome men, who look on
opi
. i'NI
to gaio force by
~rowine
o/der.
Upo'n t!lis grounu ,
propoGtions evidently fillfe o r doubtfuJ
in
thC'ir
fidl
begio .
ning, come by
:10
inverted
rul,:
of
proha6;/:I)
tO p"fs for
lIulh"n/;c
truths; a nd thoCe which dc:Cer"ed Jillle credit
f.omthe moulhs
oC
thei ..
fidl
rch.rors, are thougln togrow
tJtn,ra6l,
by age, anJ are urflcJ ::.s llndeniable.
BUl
cc:!rttlio it is, that no
prob.1hililJ
can
rife
nbove
i/I
firfl
Origilldl.
\Vha has
00
other eVldence th an
Ih e
fingl e
,.nimony of
M<
,"ilmp .
mun rhnu or fa:1 by his
only
td limony, though afterw.nos cited by hundr.:ds of others;
and is fo
f.n
from receiving any Hrength thereby. lh:u it
beeomes the we:!.ker
i
be::aufe palTion, interen, inadvcr.
tency, miClake of his meaning, anu a thoufand odd rea–
funs, which eapricious meDsminds arealleo
by,
may make
one man quote anolher's words or rnc3ning wrong. This
iJ
eenain. tbat what
in
one
age
was alhrmed opon Oight
grour.ds, can ne'rer afler come tO be ml)re \'aJjd
in
future
ag" by beiog of,en repea,ed .
!h~
focond fort ofprohahi/if} ,
is concerning thines not
falling under the reach of our. Cenres. and {herefore Dot
capa&le ..f ,en imony : Anu fueh are.
lfl.
The exiflenct', nature, .and optrations of
]fl1i/e
;mmalu·i,,1
beings wilhout us,
a.s
(I'irilr, IInge/r.
&.c. or
tht:
exifler.ceuf
ma/friol
bl!ing' , Cuch as. for thcir rma ll·
neCs or
remoltn~fs.
our
f~lIftr
cannot t:IKe notice of
j
as
whtther rhere be any
plantr.
animolr ,
&.c. in
theplant l.J,
ano other nloln!ions ofthe
'un
univerCe.
'2dly.
C oneerning
lhe
manncr
oC
operarion in mofl
paru
of the \Vork, of
nalur,
j
whcrcin lhough
\IJC
(ee the fen·
tibie
(ff.nl,
yet their caufes are ur,k nown, and we r er–
c~ive
nut tlle: ways and manner how they
:\rc
prod'lccd.
' Ve
fee
a'1;mall
are generated, nouriCherl. aDd move; l hc
loodjlon~
draws
¡roll,
&c. But the caufe9 t!lcH 0reratc,
aod the mann"':r (hey are produeed in , "e eoln oniy cuefs,
and pro'l:\bly
c('nje~ure..
In
theCe:
OlilltCn
ana!f',~)
is thc
nly
hdp
w~
have ; 2nd it is (rom that alonc
wc
d r2w
:111
our grounds of
proh"bi/;IJ .
Th\u oh(crv,nr,..
{h,n
lhe
Late
r ubbinJt o( two bodics 'riolt ntly upon on,e :tnother. r tO–
d uce!!.
hrnl,
ano very ofren
fir~,
we
h~ve
rcafé'l1 tO lhirk,
l hu
\1,
h:.t \Ve cal!
I
~.JI
ancl
fi"~
eoo(jHs in a
en;..
n vil,I\ nt
ngit:;uioo
or (he
impC'trcr(ilJlc.: miroutc
r~ns
(¡ftl ,('
bUlnl(1~
antier
1·his fo n
OfPIUI'I,II/,I) ,
Wllldl is (h, bdl (('n·
VC1.. llJ.
0.
77.
2
y
S
e s.
2 C. t
dull of ralional cx pcrimcntl, :lno ,he riCe
or
",!()!h,[u.
has alfo its uC" and influence, And a
w:try
re;.foo ing (rom
ol:a/cCJ'
leads
Us
oflen inlo {he difcol'cl y of
Iru fhJ
am!
ufe(ul
deduf/ionJ,
which would OIhcrwifc lie conecaled.
'C'hough lhe common expclience, ac::.1 lhe orJin3fy conrCe
or things, llave a miglny innuencc on the: minds
of
men,
to makc them gi \'e or rerufe credil
te
2ny thing propofed
to thei r belicf
j
yel there is ooe ca
re
wh: rcin {he llrangc.
nefs uf ,he faél
leff~ ns
no' ,he
".lfcnl
'o a
f.ir,eUimony
given of
il.
For where Cuch Cuperni\lu ral
tvrn/I
aie fuit·
abl(! lOcncl:¡ 2imed at by
HiOl
wh o
Ins
lhe power to change
{he col1rfe of naturc, lhere, uraiel fueh circumnanccs, they
may be the fiuer to proc:.: re bclief. by how much the more
thc::y are: beyondor conlrary roordinaryobravation .
This
is
lhe propc::r
cOI
(e of
mirndo
~
which. well alte:ned .
do
nOl
ol~ly
finc.1
credi~
lhem(e1 vcs, but gi\'e
it
al(o lO other
Iru/I:I.
Thcre are propofi,ions ,ha! challengc the highefl de- o
~rec:
of ou r
aJ/enl
upon bare teClimooy, whethcr the thing
propofed abrt:c or diCagree with common cxpcri.:oce and
lhe ordina, y courre of thing' or no : Thc reaCon wncre':'
of ¡s, becauCc tbe tdlimony is of fuch
an
Ollt
as cannot
deccive nor be deceived; and th at is
Cod
himfelf. This
carries with it cc:n :linty beyond dcubI, evidence beyond
e xc('ptiOD. This is called by a peculiar Dame,
rtvtla/;. n.
a nd oar
"jfor.t
tO it.
í4ith,
which has as much ecrtaio(y'
in i, as our knowledge ',felf ; and we m.y as
w.n
doubt
oC
Our own
6!ing,
as we can whcther any
revela/ion
from.
C. d
be
Iru, .
So ,ha!
failh
is a re"l.d and rure princi–
pie
of
Ufoll/
and
affuranc~,
a nd Icaves no O1anner of .
room for doubt o r heritation; onJy we
mua
b('
Cure, that
it
be a d iTine
rttUlalion,
and that we undern.tnd, it
righc, elte \Ve
O\all
expoCe our(elves tO ali the extrav:¡·
gancy or
u :thuJiaflll,
and alJ the error of w rong prindpJe"
if we hi\ve
fai/h
and
aIuranu
in what is COl
divine
r~·
vela/ion.
OfwJfon -
T M, word
" afon.
in
Englifh.
has different Ggnifica–
tion, . Sometimu
it
is taken for
Iru,
aod 'c1~ar
princi.
pler;
Comeumc9 for
clear'
andfa;r
dtduflionJ
from thoCe
principlC'!; ;. rometimes for lhe
CQu/ t ,
and particularly (or
,he
fi" ,,1
caufo:
Bu, ,he confidera,ion \.e [h.1I h". of it
he re,
¡,
as
il
fl ands .{or a
facu/ly
whcreby
1Jfon
is Cuppo.
Ceo to be diningu.thed from
ó,ajh.
anJ wherein it is evi–
dent hc r.1uch Curpaffes them .
Reafon is n«cffary , bo,h for ,he enl. rgement of pur
knowledge. anc! reguli\ting our antnt; for ie hath to do'
ooth in knowJl!dge and opinion, and
15
necetrHy and af–
fi:ling to
;¡J I
our other intelleéluaJ f3.C'ulties; and ¡noeed
eon t:tinC'
l u'~
of thclO .
t/iz.
fi rft.
Sogof;~) ,
\\hcieuy it
fi nd5
int(:lm~diale
iirar ;
f('conJly.
JI/ulion,
whereby
il
(i)
orders i\nd difpofcs of thl.:m , as to dlfcover what
conneélion Ihcre is io e..ch link of ,he ch,lio, whereby
the
eXlr~ratS
are
hcJd
rogtlher, and the reby, as it were.
to cfr41lV lOio
ViClV ..
h:!
truth fou gh l
(or;
\t
hlch
IS
that \Ve
nll
dI
,I. ~ ,,',
o:"
il~rn a:.:~
•
•
!r.d
~on(iffs
in
nothing blH (h e
rl.fccption
of
lhe
conn~(titln
tIlere
¡,
~et
.... cr:n
tillo'
Id~1I1
iD
l H)¡
fkp
(If
It:.C
o
·du8IUn; whcrcby lhe mind
COIl1t"S t O
h'': l.\:J...:r lhe
c<'I~;:i:J a~rl!:C1'!n{
or
dIlJ~rt:cm'nt
oC
~ny
E
t
t\V~ ·