4000003585

363 / 510

ri s ri i 1
nll"turio quancrr tis cxi
ius et, quan1 e 1g nti l orum;
ho i!la do et, eíl ~aun n a-
o po Hu ille d buic prob r •
Arnag et ph} t.Difpur.~·
robar quod r d r irupen -
r lir · ell ff u prinurius
Ut nto. uj no is inno–
tefcic q uancüa impene racione, guam icw
e::orponbus xp imur; fed non poíli 11 s ponc–
re eífentiam ci 1s jo l"tu li impenctr ci n ro–
pter argum nra ex Fidc: ergo d bct poni i11 i·
gcntia e lis impenetrarionjs, feu jn cepug1 n·
tia ex natura e~i e m alío corpore in od au
loco, ficut em nriam h cninis ponimus non i
a lu li dHcur u, kd in poten ria ad d ·f~ ur n
d •
·. 14. Ho~ argumentun1 tarn prob .,q u ln·
tiratclll conftitui p r ímpenetrabiJitatc ,quin1
per diudibi!itJt•1n, zqualitatcm, &c. q oniarn
x rifiot 1c oinnís cíl ·1Hia in notctc1 nobis
pee propriccatcs, & p 1Iiones fuas; diuiilt ilit s
a u ce n, ~qu litas, re. ex eoje, Ari totelu
patli n s , & proprierat s q u cuüaris f ne : Et
'ª n in fuJs · arguer equilpiam íic. Ex p ri-
1nur in corporibus diuifionem,~qualirlteru,&c.
quibus nobj mnot 1c1r c:orum quantitas; arqui
non d ~ .. us pon re clfenti quan titarjs iJ1.J
a li 1ui 10 e, ... quationc, &c. e go deb t
1i m xig n i di iíionis, a: uarraris, ~,. Vn·
yl og1h ius A1 i ~z 1ninim · prob t cfte·
ltu pnmanum quantiratis, {e \ t pludmum
11 n fil' aut proprietacem' & q uidem apo·
nori, ll14l forma •
• 1 5. i us controuerf. 7. Mcraphyfic~
n • • ·•l· [Re cio (inqua) definitimuri d ran1
pcr cxi.;c1 ti n cxtcníionis, & probo , dandam
pcr ig nti m imp n rrarionis, quia licet d •
finitiO Hla reét.' xplic r Cdlenti m quantiratis
iuüibilis, q u 111odo e ll ; non rede explica e
e I ·nti m q u nritatis rndiui fi il Js,q ux po íhb1lis
e , cui e ugn e cxtcn 10 cu, um f amen–
tit t 1 ,cuc J iuiíibilis íic, ,. o ninó íimf l x,
e A. u 1 , 'a11u r non lJs, qu encita
b r 1mpc.n tr b1hc~ t u1, p r quam....
e cori/iituerctur qi,antitAs. ]
H :ac rar10 t l ng b"'{}, t probet,
cxt·ncion noncon ituiqu ntir t in, fedim·
p u tr bilic re, \'r p rü' nobi corum det in–
tcntum; t ccmr aim, qu nticatem, qu m no·
bis xpllcuit Arifiorcl ~s, & q 111 D us n1odó
rodu.xit in e bus per exrcn 1one , & non per
imp~n trabilic rcm con tic i, quod dl rotum....,
quo volu s, q ó t 11 lia q ntitas ha–
b ns li lU et... nti m u pofhb1li ,nec n ? nunc
non cfl ad re l , n e ind ontr nos v ll u r in-
rc b urdum. 1 1110 h e Ouiedi argumen.
t ti ne poílct quifpia íimilircr probare Ani–
m l rationa/e 1 on íl bonam d nitionem Ho·
1 i · m qu n1 is nim l ratiooalc r lle
xpJicet h mmen1 • qui d
non r e pl1 ebon in 1
]j O, l Ollt
íib1l\. íI
III. IS
g Ani 1 l r fo J non cíl or
mis. ' t conf 1uenr1a ,pot11b1h
admitfc , hamo non e t orp· , 1u n :
nec ani 01 1: ce e Ouied1 diC uríu , eere
nihil prob t" n "hiJ oos pungir. \ de r0 0,
quan1leu ·bu rariunculis co 1mun l fen n–
t1am r omin l :s iluput)nJrc aud ,1[,.::>l rfanrur–
q u impune •
§. 17. s~ vero Doctor Suarez quen1 Tcllc–
zius falsó dicic, pri um h ne fenreuciam inu •
XJff modefiior m f g UJc, agoouit enim, To.
n1inalcs nunquam probare pofi"e, imp nctrabi·
li"~cem effc ip am effi ntiam , feu formJI m ffi -
aun1 primarium qu.inrjtatis 1 nofquc manitc·
ius ollend re , illlm non cff .. ni fi paíltonern... ,
propri rar~m .. quanrit ci • Yndcing nu',vc
vir er t doél:usJ cer r inopian1 argumcncorum
pro fua opinion , pcr jmpcnccrabilit t"' m.....
1 011 niG dcft. _ri~ri.1e, & ta_nqu m per propricta·
r mcxph ri d1 1C quannra~ m, ud.l: .Refpon•
dctur (inq iir) fer e nunq1,am nos poffc rtrum effe11tias
p1011t in rt: fume p/Jcare, ftd per ordintm ad abqu~rn
r pr ·eeate , [Jt1fq11e ~rte/iare 1.11demur quando per
t m proprlftate ', 'JU:C e/I prima omnium, & prox1m
tff~nti~ rei , tam dec/aram11s • [)einit ( A u n u
nuoc Lec or) non d1cimur, effentiam quantitatis cen–
fiflere ÍrJ apt itudine t.rpellendi a/l•d corpus , vtl refi–
fiendi illi , n' in ide111 fp•lium ingredi~tMr • N am bote
¿¡ptitudo formaliicr fumpt• refle ínter proprietaus
IJUantit.itis numuatur. Quid clarius potuic ho-
1ni!ticre ubícríbc e ~ne nri1E ~ ergir, & 111 m
di ir , fe el pl i ~a re pe r ci reu nl 1 q u uCJ o ne i m-
penetr bi itlt1s: Sed d1eimus ~inquit effe formarn
d ntem rtbus corporearr. molem , ve{ txtenfio 1em effc
cffentialem r .Jttontm q11antitatis • ~ 1id vt1·0 fi t bJbe •
re molem corporearn , txp/i,are non poffMmus, mfi per
1Jrdinem ad hunc effeE/u,,, , 'JUI eft txpellere fim1tern
molem ab eodcm {patio • notJ 'fuidem aflt1 , jed aptim–
Jine. lea ille M caphyf. Dlfpuc.40.íCél.4.nu1 i.1 •
Fa us ctl Doélor luc, nulla ratio 1 probH f
paíf'- e 14 ncia 1 quancicaris pcr primum e. -
orrualcm illiu'i, fcd Jolum per l' um_,,
q u d notJuerat ag. nch z ·fi. 1 +·
his v crbis: .At i/lt •cutus Author ( 1 ) non
ne,~abit nobis , non expl1et1i/[e quid fit in fe ratio form -
lis 1u4nrit 1tis; fe1l hoc folum expltcuit per fuum effe·
8u1t1, 'IUÍ4 nim1rúm non potefl fec11m compati atiarn
quantitatelfl in eodem loco • •••• nec fentenliAm h.1nr;
aliquibus, -vel •Hthoritat1b11s, vel r11tionibus probat •
ic ille. Vnd mirandum dt, mod rno n n
t culi opi purar , iC eílcnriam u ri ..
ralis cu t dicentes, e:un el~ imp n rr -
bilitar m, \1ahde proballe, um camcn.,
ex ip(a ucis uar zij confrflione, nofir x·
peracnci on ce, os in rmc pugn r • cll z
·ero potuir arios ut ores kgifli , qui h ne
fenten i m dicunt eífe uiltdmi h m1 l e
upra cir to, anri u 01111 fl , e m u d cn–
dunt omnes jj uthor s, q uos innomin to i–
cat ur ndu in u reo dil in .4 .gu t.6 . .se-
cund u mod u duendi, ip~ mee d u in •
qure . 4. t in ra u ram nt. ap.z •
bri l fu p r n n 01 J 4 . .P r r a v d ..
tur. le 1 i em t bri lin4. i m
cundo not nd1 t zt i in J •