It
E L 1
c:
t
O
~~,
o
R
T II E O L O
c:
Y.
5·i5
not rafs ot"cr in fill!ncc th:n ' which is callcd lhe::
C\hlft
11
01
¡,ti
01"
Ecckfi ..
fEc
P rudcnct:; whufc ot-.jctl is
th..:
eXterior
ord<!r
or arrnngC::nlcnt of
d\\::
Chrif
~i.tnchurch.
(JI:
principies
(t)I!lId–
c~1
on th.e H
:)ly
Scri (lturt!; an I w',iC"h
He pr0ftt'r, nt)lollly
to maill[3in
rdigion
in its pllliry
and (pl':Il..lM,
bm
IUdcfend
it
"~.Iinft
all fcht(ms, ddlcnfions aud rcp:u
IlU C'1I
~
wh:nc\'cr.
1 'his ce:onomy is nccrff.try in rhe counC'ils, th..: (ynflds. lhe
cOllfiUorics, ano in the
(:\C'Ullics
of
theol()~v.
\Vc mur
not, howi!ver, confound th:s Wil h lhe
ccdclialtic
jurifpru.
dente, whieh is
the
feienee of jm'crp, cling and tl.pplyinC
lhe
bws. inf1ituted
by
the foverci¡:n ,
rcl..u ive
tn tilt;
perrons.
g0ods, and alf..irs of the chu rch;
wherl'j(S lhe ohjeél" of
conliHurial prud('lIce is
(he
arnnr.ement of lhe church itfelf, •
:linO (he eccldiallu.: Hate, on C rlntli"n and rational max:ms.
l 'lle one
i5
a Con of legifl,¿tion
in
¡tfdf; anJ lhe othcr, on
lhe contrary, an application of lhe civil
1"\1,15.
Il.
The theologlcftl prudence ¡"dudes thererore,
lidl,
lhe \l/hale pl.m af church-goveroment, ;tnd the arrangeOlent
of
lhe
('cclefiaflic (l:ale
j
lecondly, the orclinances rehnive
(O
exterior ceremo,nies, :\nd di vine \Vorlbip; and lallly, the
chfc.ipEnc! of the church, the errors, the
fchifm~,
the here·
ries, and
difT~(J{jons
that arife among ChriHians. The fource
of this prudence is a thorough knowleoge of the cfTenee of
.he Chriftian religioo, and (he methoJ of drawing from
it
j u!t confequences.
111 . This difeipline is like\Vife employcu in deeidillg,
' Vhereio confias lhe dtff\. rence between lhe c1ergy and lhe
Jaity; or
ir
there be. in f'la, any rc,d ddF..:rence betwecn
them: if the ehureh form , di!linét
!I...
e in the general fy_
llcm of governmcM; and to whom belongs lh! righ;
01'
de·
ciding
circa lacra;
and what are 'the limits of tht! fpiritual
and temporal powers in this refpeét: whereio confifls lhe
hierarchy of the church, and what are its rights and privi.
Jeges: to whom apperlain5 Ihe nomin11ion of a prieíl, or
olher ecclcfiaflic. accordir g to the divine ordinance: to
whom
is
committed the right of preachir.g io puDlic. of ad–
mioiHeri og lhe facrltments,
anJ
of exercifing (he ex.:ommu·
nicative power of expelling, or again admiuing, any p'lni–
cular ehrini.;;n, or even
a
wholr;: country. into the pale of
the church : the bans and interd¡éh: lhe exercife of faered
or lheologic (ludies; lhe Cchaols, lhe f<."minaries,
lhe
uní·
vedilies aod academíes. the
e
Itdrl!
S ,
the convcnts; and
Ca
of
the
rtn :
all
fubj <~l;
vigorouOy attaeked .nd
o~nin¿tely
de–
fended.
IV_ T he conGnorial prudence e'(amines Iikewife lhe li.
turgic:s, the
cer~mvnics
and
rdi~iou5
CJ(hms , Ihe brHi,,_
ries , lhe lIttlals, th: canlicles,
an.:1
orher book, or de\,(l' ion
adopteJ by the chtrch ; the
furm\lI,l,II~s,
eh: liljdls of
<1
r.
cipline, &.c. &c,
(h..:
crceds, lhe conf:;.!li )ns
lJ
(Jllh. thc ca–
techlf.í1S, "od many othtr Ilke nlattt>n
~
2nd
I.lfl!y,
the
doub:s .md OJj::éls of conlrovedy. Iha t tlcctií¡()n Ihe h(1Idir.g
of fynod, 'Iod cou!lcds; th: queHion, ir dIe l'opt: b:- Abo\ e
the counc!!!, or (he councils aboye the Pope
i
thlt pr:\tllce
of d enchtic thlOlogy, or the public d en<..hy ; tht!
f~'p tr~'
tion and rl'uniCJn of the chulch, which the Syncrt'titls anrl
Jreni2 ns dlfp!.: te ¡ the dlvorces more or leCs allowable; ma·
trimonial. and conftHori;t,1 man ers, &c. &c,
V . AII thefe fubjel1s, and 'n infini,y of others. whieh
a!iCe from . or have an immediate conl'lellion W,th tlu:fe.
recl\lire tO ue lhoroughly confidered. rcduceJ in to a regul",
ryH~m ,
eX:'Ildioed and fi>ced
0 0
folid prinf'iples. ,m I
COII·
Jmnctl I)y j...:fl and
pCrlin~nt
cxampl(!s, f ,om AI I lills re·
fe:"
wha,
l¡
e,lItd
E,clc~,nie
l'rudclle". T his fcieo,"
h"
not yct
he_~n
flch:c::-d ioto a fyflt:11l or forr.l':;! rliC\'i plint:,
ami
dl.ttpnncll'all y bcc,¡uCe it has
bc~o
conHanth' confuund'–
crl wnh Ih..!
cc(;)cfiaflie law :
bu! {ha:.
in
r~
...
I,,·v
~¡{rc!rs
a..::
ml1ch rroln tllis, as pulni ;.iI prud\.nec
d~jrcl s Iro~1
th.:: com·
mon law.
0f 1 'IIEO LO C I C
P RunF~Cr.
in tlr
Dlrr ERE~ T
ruxc–
TI O~S
of tlc
M1SI STM,Y,
L
l NDErF.NOEN T
of cafuinic,,1theoloJ!Y, "nd of the
ceca·
nomy of lhe church in genend. lhe thcologian has. more·
over, necd of greal Cagacity io lhe r arricu l.H exereifc of his
miniHry ; and milny ablt: di\·ines have reduceu lhis ¡cienee
into a fyltem. and have givcn general preeepes, :\nd partí.
cular rules , (or lhe conduél: of lhe rnini lter of lhe ah,H, in
the difl'('rent circumflances chat may ariCe in this part of his
dlU y, ' Ve Oull decline lhe pan icular cxpl'ln;uion of thde
dífF(rent Cyrtcms, as
it
would J!ad us into numbed cls
mi·
nuti.e. Conrad P orla
has wrote a work
00
the fubjetl, in –
tided
Pajlor(1/~
L"th(ri ,'
Stoltzdinus, Kortholt, Philip
Hahn, Hanm;¡,n, and many other theologi;ms, have wrote
luge volumes eoocerniog
ie
i
but. aboye
all ,
the trcatiCc of
Dr.
J.hnJIoIJJ"',
whieh is e.llod
/J'II/[.,,'II /J'I;lJijlr;
ec–
c/~Ji.c.
is
tO
be conCuhed on this malter.
V/e
lhe more rca.–
dily omil the oames aoJ tides of ot hcr works of this kind,
as we have prefcriberl ie la ourCelves as a law, tO avoid,
ilS
much a! pofTlble, lhefe Cons of e!latioos, feeiog chal
the
num:'er of new books thar are continn.uly appeariog fre.
quendy fup erfede their predccefTo,s; and moreover, in this
pan
of theology, each Chriai an eommunion h,¡s its parti·
eular authors, who treal it
in
conformity lO the: dogmas and
principies which lhat communion adopts ,
Ir.
The humour of reduclOg evely
thi.ngioto fyflem, has
alCo taken place
in
lhis m..u er, which in filé\": appcars
lO
have no oecarion for any peculiar diCcipline lh;¡t cou ld oot
be includcJ under fome other pan of theulogy. BUt :'8
this di!llnaion is already made. it is our bufinefS to explain
ir , for the uCt! of fuch as devore (hemfelves to the altar,
The prudcnti¡¡1 lhcology ls, for thcm anu their minillry ,
what polmeal prudence is for a Olao of lhe \Vorld in the
commerce of
lite.
Ir
is the art of au aining
lhe
end prl).·
poCed: and as eaeh conditlon in Jire has its putlcular pur·
fuin, lhe dlvines have alfo n'llur'llly thein , and th::
[lre:·
ceprs of theoJogic prudence fcrve to condutl: thern to
jt.
11 L
110t as lhe d"gm;¡s, the ceremoni(s, Ihe rites
;01'1
objt:tts tlta( the minillers of Iht: ddrl!rent Chrillian commu·
oions propoCe to Ihem(t:!ves,
are.'
by
no means lhe fame,
f'lch cCHnmunion . ea\!h f<él, does !l01 fullow, in lhis reCpeél,
Ihe lame rult!s anJ precepES, nor ('ven part of Ihe
CAme
prin–
cipies. AII
th.ttwe can thl.!rcforc do an,idlt Ihis di\cdity
of
0plI,ions , and tontrtlriety of nnxim5. is
10
point out, in
a few worJs . Ihe prineip:tl objeéli tlut (.ní!' or other of lhem
co.lIprehend in
tlllS
part of
[ h~· r
p¡dlorA I theolof!Y.
1V. T hc
A/utic
'f hrol"g)
,
f;)r ln!tJnee, trC;HS of lhe
various particular exerciles of picty ; and the rrinciplcs.
tlHl
il
pi opnlcs wilh Ibis
re~ard.
fer ve as gniJes to the mi ·
niHer 01 the
al{.lr~
in his rccommendal ion oí Ihe pr,,\.9ice of
jt,
as \\ ·11 as in many pans uf h:s
eedc:r.aClicduty, FAlh ,
pil!!rimio)'.u:. :::nd lOany other m;llten of lh,e fame kincl,
h~.
Jon~
tO
Ihe I'rovince of aCc..:tic
{hcolo~n> a~d
wlli, h we \Viii
nOI
ablolutdy rcj :d l, uecAu:c \Ve wlne lor rcaJc:rs of all
forts of eOI1llHUO\0I1S. Truth, howt:\ter, o!>liges \:s
lO
re:·
m.\lk. th,Il Ihe afl..'l,tic IhctlloJ!Y of enry
c~mmllnion
iS.lh~
u!rslJn ng, oi' l'riilc'pL's falCdy llUibu¡cJ tO lhe Gofpd, a nrt
bdc!'l!~~