Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  621 / 868 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 621 / 868 Next Page
Page Background

I~

E L 1 G I O N,

o

R

T 11 E O L O G Y.

{aeh contro\'er(y, (rom hi:1ory. 5. Ex

Im;"c

lh e

nil.l\1 r~ 1

arder

a~(ordlng

la

w:)i~h

al! the errors h.tve

l.tk

~n

lhe;r

I

d~.

"the one (ruin

Ihe

othc.. r : anti

h lUy.

6

C(lIl fronl tI:t

rcf"pcc ,

tive art;lInlcnts. lhe anfwers,

anlt

exct.'ptions , tn,H c.l .h

party has made

10

dl'fcnJ

ils

c.wle.·

" 0

;dl Ihis

1$

to bt!

addecl, 7 \ Vh:n (hey

ed il

C111egium

dijputar') ,

11111,:

:'IIl

ex·

u

c.fe

.

by

\V llIeh

all

{llar is ¡c"roed in

lhe

c10kt

.mello

lhe

fchools ís callcd fonh

;:¡nd

:tntmatecl ,

under lhe inrpl..{tion

of a pro(c{f¡Jr ; anu

lhl! m;nd

is

accllttom~d

la

tnink,

anJ

lhe tonguc

[O

rpe.tk

,

wi: h

f..

cdi,y

and dlic<lcy.

VIII. Th..: princip;:¡1contdls in whieh the theologia n may

be engaged , are,

l .

Againrl: [hoCe wha adl11it of no revcaJ.

ed relígion ; as

lhe

athe;í! and

u(i(l,

2.

AgainH lllOCe \Vho

a~mí[

of a revcaled religion, bUI adopt nOI lhe trlle Rc::vd .l–

tion; as Ihe Heathens, the Mflhomelans,

6 c.

3'

r\gain(l

thofe who bdievc anly a pan of {he trUe: RtlVddllOn ; as lhe

J ews.

4 .

Aga; nfl thofe wha add tO the true Revelation

nutter foreign

w

it

j

as trad itions,

ec.

5.

AcainH thoCe

who mak.e a f,tIfe interpretation uf Ihe C"cred leXI, and dr.&w

from il erroneous Cyllems; as lhe hel'etics and lhe fdllrnll–

tics.

&e.

Anrl lalUy, 6. Ag.inll thore ", ha m, k. a wrong

ufe of ce rt ain expreffions

o(

R c\'elation, and build. on

whimfica l nOliaos, ridlculous fyltems ; as the F.tnatics,

~a.kers .

&e.

I X. According to this ¿iviGon, the t!teologian will have

l O

combat pri nei p,llIy ""i th,

l .

T he Atheills, with Spinora al their !tead .

2 .

The D eills.

3. The Healhens and Idolaters.

4. The Mahometans.

5. The modern Jews.

6.

The Al ¡ans and

M

an¡cheans, or ra.ther thofe: who

in theCe days follow their antienl erron .

7. T he Socinians . .

8. The e"ltolics, oppored to the PrOtenants.

9. The P rOtenants, oppured tO the e.tholics.

10.

Tite M" linills, oppored tO the j.tnreOlns .

11. The J anrenifls, oppored to the Multndl•.

12.

T ite Rcfurmed, oppored to the L llIherans.

13. T he L utherans, oppored tO the Rcformed.

J

4.

The Armi nians.

15. The Anabaptifls.

16. The W eigelians.

17 . The

~,ke"

or T remblers.

18 . T he Fanatic.,

at

the head of whom i. Jacob

Boh m.

19. The pretended neIV Prophet9 .

2 0 .

Tite Indi/ferentS.

2' .

The P,eti!! •.

2 2 .

The Moravian Brethren. or the H erenhuters ,

6e.

X No\V,

as eaeh of lhe religions, commun;ons, or hcre*

fies aboye mentioned. have nOl rcrupled lo pul>lifh tO lhe

world thei r dogmas and creeds, (he theologiJo ought careo

f"!ly to innrué! himrdf in thore fymbolic book., in wh;ch

eaeh of thcm

h.ve

comprifed its ry(lem; to lIudy and

10

make

a

gaod

d.~alyfis

of

t11t.. m : and

10

prep.tre fueh argu–

ments as are the moft juít, the moll weighty, and propcr

t o confulc Ihe," .

X I.

~dore

Wt;

quit this fubjdl . there is onc remark

to

be

rn

H-Ie, or r.Hhcr one caUlion thal is very eff\!ntiJI, which

lile wuuld

otra

tO the young;

theolo~i

....n: \Vhich

19,

that lhe

;j>OJemic i. uftful, anJ cyen nccclr..y io the (Iudy of tltco-

logy il' J!('ocr..

tI;

but thal it is a c..I ifcipline v.-hich

our.ht

to

be

Irl.!aicJ

\Vllh grc..

1

plud'::lce .. nJ nwdcralion. LJ,r pu·

t<flion in gener.d IS

a

thngt':.!'.Is

:1.rt

;

ftnd rellginus dllputa–

tion is

.t

J t..ccit(ul fll l, and

uf

infinlte peril.

T he

(ludcot

wdl

d)

IIJ:'lt wd l to rl!ml'mber, thal thc!re is

00

(e,-C(,

00

eOIlHll:l1lion

un

cHIIl. tllAt

IS

perfeél ly true in

.m

its

do~mas

wlthout

cx·;cp;;lon: th tt lhen: are fome- fmall errors In ..

11

rc.:lig.:lns ; lhu in(.tlltballty ncver \\'''''', oor C\'er wdl be,

lhe

porl i\m o( hU ln..l, nlly . He fhollld Ilkewife rememher,

t hit

the m IItcrs

w!w

,eaeh him, or ,he books that he reads, are

conH.l ntly p 'flial lo lh e rc::ltgion they pl ofefs :

and

lhat

when

h~

h ,IS

fi.rpportcd a Ihc·(is, and confu led his al

1

verfanes in

a

ctlllc).!i

ti

dlfpllfC ( where hls adver(.t.ries, as

well

as

h.s

pre–

ceptur!', are of Ihe fam: f¡de o( Ihe queftion, aod \ViII not

f,,¡J

10

,Hl jlhige him the vc80ry,) he (hould

be

perfu.tded,

thal lhe

vlC~hH

y \Vollld not ha\'e lIe::n fa eafi ly obtaloea

h...d

he

(ont~ndcd

with ótblc advcrfaries of the oppofi te rdlgioo:

he OlOuld remt:m' c:r. that

we

triumph without glory when

we c( mb¿t

\1,

idlUUl

danger

j

í\nd

·Iet hlm not be valO o( his

J.H1rels, nor imagine himfelf fome wonderful {chalar

j

fee.

ing that it

IS \'1:1

y poffible, th..u he;: may Ca off viélonous

{rom (ueh a d.frute, that he may receive:

,'aH

applanfe from

his profcfft'ls and his colleagues, anJ at ,he faOle time ha'{"e

r..foned )¡ke a dol,.

Xl[ O n the olher h.nrl . the mon

.bl~

theologían., . nEl

the mo!l confllmmate profdfors

in

tllIs fcience, lIugh t to be

cooOantIy on Ihcir guard againíl lhe abule of polemic theo·

logy

j

whi..:h

(r('quentl y ferves le{s

tO

clear and confi rm the:

truth

of

the dogm:ts o( a commUnlon, than tO

dhbldh

per–

petu,"¡ dlreord "nd hal red among Chriílians. E\'ery t!leo–

lo~itln

fhould alfo rcmcmber, thal by Ihe nature of the fub·

jetl.

il is nl)( poflible

lO

produce

d~lI/(;nJlrQlion

in (u ppon of

)-is tht fes and oplnions

j

bu! thal hls argu mt.ots will be on–

ly

valld . itnd preponderate in proportian

10

(heir

de~ree

of

evidence ; and

I.dlly,

lhat it is " ridlculous and infuffe rable

vanily

te

imagin~J

thitl e\'ery man, who does nnt cbink pre–

cirely as we do, i. gutlty of pJlpable error.

PASTO

R.AL

T HEOLOGV.

1.

H AVING

defe ribed Ihe theoreric friences of

lheolo~r,

we

no",

come to thofe 'which

r~c;ud

lhe praél:ice.

Ir

would

~e

to burr the ta.!ents lha! God h"s g;vt,. n him. and Ihe

lIudtes Ihat he

h .iS

mdde,

i(

Ihe theo1ogl4ln did not employ

them

10

,he t dtli":.tllon of his neighbour, and Ihe pro(perH Y

of Ihe Church. Hls offiee

;0

(ucit'ty is attendeJ \\11th eon–

(b r,t

olod anxious

I~bt,urs

H I".'

.s clurgcJ

wlth

Ihe'

,::Ir~

,/

fou/¡,

wirh

.he inOru{h on o( yOlllh. wit h pre..l,ching of Ihe

G ol pd, lhe condutl

of

hls t\u,,·k. and lhe adminnlr.uion of

the: Sdcraments, with vlli '.tllons

10

,he.'

fick ;:¡ nd 'lhe dy, ng,

with c.t lming

' h('

l error~

o(

Wt

ak

mlnds, wi th admiOlllnng

comfons

tO

.c ffi:élt·cI

fnu ls. and many other fundlons eqll,d ly

d ffi ..:ult and importam. T he prtlélicallclt"oct's Ih.H

w t'

11ull

hcre der..:rtbe, wdl fcrve him as

g~lIdes

in this

unbound~J

field.

11 p.noral theology ís u(ually divideJ into time par,,;

which are.

, . Ilnmil;tic T hrulogy.

2.

C'

.Ul!chl'tlc

Th.'olo~y.

3. e,ru"lic Throl"gy.

T o which are

:lJdcd•

.1,

The Conliltorial Pl'tI.!: nce .

5. Thl' !"ud

111131

E.s.clclc ofehe Jilr.:rc:nt

f.llh.'li~'05

of

lhe minl11.)'.

.-\.