Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  387 / 1042 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 387 / 1042 Next Page
Page Background

D

e

439

D

e

lily or counlry wilh Ihat of another, il adruils of

a

plural; for we fay,

'tIJhile 'tIJoodl are in gClla al

j ijirr

Ihall

mI;

or

lV,jI'/lIdiall 'tIJoodl are in

ge·

11".1

01

grea"'r (pte!pcgravily Ihall Ihe El/rop,."

"",.d"

BUI unid;where Ihe colotIT, or fome quali.

Iy which difli oguiO\es it from growillg \Vood, is

meolioned, Ihis plural ought as much as pollible 10

be al'oideJ, as il always fuggefls :ln idea of growing

\Vood.

jlOIJU;

denoling, that dIe former are al a

d.rhne~,

and Ihe la!ter al hand. And, in Ihe Came manner

il is invariably applied 10 denole any prcfenl "bjcé;

in Ihe plural number, as oppoCed to

l!o'fe ;

as

¡hefo

or

I;'ir oN leJ,

as at hand

al'

at a difl ance;

Ihe/e

01'

Ihir tre<l,

&c.; bit! ncrer in the fi n&ular

nu~,.

ber, as it is alwavs

Ihil

ur

Ihúl Iru h1'

&c.

I

,

As the Englith language is Co exccedingly

irregul~r

in

the pronuncialion, Ihe faOle le!ter in the Callle f¡tualion'

oflen afl'uming

C~unds

lotally dilFerent in di[ erellt

word~

3.

lVood

likewife denotcs

a

number of trees grow·

ingnear one another; being nearly fynonymous wilh

forif/ :

See

FOR EST .

[n this fenCe it always

admils of a plural; as,

re 'tIJoodl and 'tIJildl 'tIJhoft

folilary gloollJ,

&c.

A diétionary cannot be reckoned complete wilhout ex·

plaioing obColele words ; anri

iC

Ihe terms of the feveral

provincial provincial dialeéts were likewiCegiven, il would

be of grw milily: nor would Ihis take much time; be·

caufe a number of thefe words need no other explanation

Ihan tomark along with them thewords which hadcome

in Iheir place, whenthere happened10 be oneperCeétlyfy.

nonymous: and in theCe caCes where Ihe Came idea could

nOI beexprelfed io modero language wilhout a periphrafis,

it would be of uCe tO explain them diflinétly ; fo Ihal,

whenawriler Cound himCelf al a lofs for a term, and ob·

liged to Cearch for ooe beyond Ihe bounds of our own

language, he might take one of IheCe, when he found

Ihat il was'exprellive and energetic, in preference to ao·

other drawn from a foreign language. This would at

leafl have ooe good eff'eél : il would make our language

more fi xed and flable ; not tofaymore accu rale and pre·

ciCe, than by borrowiog from foreigo languages. The

following examples may feTVe to

give

fome idea of Ihe

manner of Ireating this par! of the work.

1110E,

or MO.

adj.

An obColele lerm Oill employed

in IheScotchdialeél, and by thempronouoced

lIIae :

denoting a grealer number, and oearly Cynonymous

wilh

mere;

but it difFers in this reCpea, tlul, in

the Scotch dialeél,

/JIae

aod

mair

(Englith,

lIJm)

are each employed in Iheir dillinél Cphere,- wilhout

eocroaching upon one anolher ;

~'ae

being employ.

ed 10 denole number, but never quaolily or quali.

Iy; and

INair,

10 denole quanlily and qualil)', bUI

never number : Ihus Ihey faymlt, nOI

mair

aN/n,

mln,

&c. aod Ihey Cay

lIIair,

not

lIlae cI.,h,

earlh, cOl/rage,

&e. See

MA

I

R.

Both of Ihefe

terms are fupplied by the word

.nore;

which,

in the Englith

languag~,

is applierl indifcriOlindtely

to

d~note

quantity, quality, and numbél'. See

MO RE.

711fR .

prOIl.

ObColete; Oill emplo)'ed in the Seolch

Jialcél: Ihe plural of

Ih";

alld conmlled

10

Ih-ft,

in the Carne manner as

Ihal

is to

In .

..,s Ihere is no word in the EngliOI lallgu1gr equiva–

lenl 10 this, we tbus Olewthe OIanner in which il is

cnlployed. In the Englifh

lang".~'!

we Cay,

Ihal

jl.ne

or

houft,

pointing at one at adilbnee,

ill.r¡ger

IJr

1/I'Jr( COIJl1IJlJdio1J1

Ihan

thll flanr

or

thiJ

hflll{(,

which isfuppofcd

10

be .t hand. InIhc f:llnemano

ner, ill Ihe SNleh di"hq, Iltey

(;'y.

Ih,/;

((lr

.u

it

1'. prunoun-:.d,

Iha, )

jl.lI<

1 are 'tIJhll,1'

Ih3/1

Ihil'

it is impollible

10

eflablith any general rules on litis fub:

jeél, which do not adOlit of manyexceplions:

Ih~refore,

a diélionary is the befl means of aCcemining and poinl'

ing OUI the proper pronunciation of words. For, if Ihe

writer firn poillted out all the diff'erent founds Ihat l!te

fame letter eould el'el' be made to expreCs, alld alliooed

10 every panicular found which eaeh lelter could be

made (O alfume, a particular mark, wltich was appropri.

ated to denote that panicular Cound of tite le!ter wh.n.

ever

it occurred ; by placing Ihefe particularmarks above

the letters in the diélionary, the Cound of eaeh lener

would be pointed OUt in all cafes wilh the ulmofl cero

tainty.

lt

would be impollible for us to illuOrate thisby

examples, witllOut firll aCceminingall Ihefounds of each

lener; whieh would lead us inlO a diCcullioa 100 longfor

tltis placc ; and this is at prefent the more unnccelfary, as

the public have becn long in expeélation of a diétionary,

by a very able hand, in which Ihis panicular will be ato

tended to o

We Olall only funher obCerve, thal, ber.des havin'

the accemed fylJable of every word

propuf;

diflinguitheJ

i? a dilqionary tOallill in Ihe

pr~nu?cialion,

(he Eog.

11th languasereqUlres anolher e[enual ImproVemenl,

viz.

the uCe of accenlS tOdiflinguith the meaning of

'tIJ~rdl

and

phrafel ;

which, although it is not fo properly con.

fined 10 a lexicographer, yet it is nOI quile ,vilhout his

fphere. Thus Ibe word

al

admits of two very different

founds, as well as different fignifications; as in this ex–

aOlple, "Cicero was nearly

al

eloqucnl

al

DeOloOhenes :"

in \Vhich the firn

al

is pronO\;nced

ofi,

. nd Ihe laO is

pronounced

az.

Now, it oflcn happells, tbat, in reaJ'

illg, Ihepanicular way in which itought 10be underOood

is not pointed out by Ihe COnteXI, till afler Ihe word it.

feIf is pronounced, which has an equal chanee at leaO of

oeingpronounccdwrong; \Vhereas, if it \Vere always ae.

cented when employed io the one fenle, and not in Ihe

olher, it would free the reader froOl Ihis perpbity.

There are other cafes in which Ihe uf. of proper accelllS

in wriling would be of great conCequencc; as

at

Ihe

b~eilllliogof a fenlence, whenit \VaspUl asaquenion, Or uCed

irollically,

&" .

Ihe wallt of whiclt . YeI.y

000

lIIull ha\e

obCervcd. BUI as Ihis

do~s

nut

Co

properly bdonc 10

Ihe Icxicngrapher as thog"antnlarian, we Olall herc lak•

no furlhl'r nOlice of il.

Tite abo

ve

cx.mples,

\Ve

hope, will be Cullicient tOgi, e

Ihe reacler

IO~le id~d

oC

Ih~

pJ.ln

Ih,1

\Ve

woulJ prJpoC,';

ano enablc hlnt 10 delernttn'" whclher or nOI a di.'lioll.

ary, exwucd upon Ihis plan, would ,onl'ey to hi, mind

a 1II0re P"Ifc,q k>wwl"dge of ¡he

LII~lifh

J.lngu.lge, IIt.n

Iltufe rli,Qioll3'¡'s Ihat

h.II

·' beln hilheno publiOlcd.

Th&