Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1011 / 1042 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1011 / 1042 Next Page
Page Background

L

o

G

c.

tation impliedin the u'or¿

IhiJ

is of a more cOII(,ned n.–

ture than in the Cormcr caCe.

l'rorofition,

f .ml

mm

arl ""ife:

for hm wifdonl is not

~Ifirnled

of cvery panicular man, but relb ained tO a few

01'

the human fpecies.

Now flom this

Jiff~rent

appearance of the general i·

dea, th,t coonilUtes the Cubjea of any

judgm~nt,

arifes

the divilion of prupof,tiuns into

ul/iverfal

and

parlicular.

An

ul/iverjal

prupor.tion is that wherein the fubjea is

fome general term, taken in its Cull latituoe, infomuch

Ihat the

pr<dicat~

Agrees 'o all the individuals compre·

hended under it, if it denolesa proper fpecies

i

aod tO all

the CtVeral Cpe i(s, and their inuividuals, if it marks an

idea of a highcr order.

Th~

words

a/l, lV"J, n., n' M,

&c. are the proper figos of this univerfality ; and as they

(ddomfail to

accomp~ny

general t,uths, (o they are the

¡nofl obvious criterion whmby tO .dillinguiíh them .

A/I

anil/la/¡ hove a p01JJer

b'g;/In;ng 1/Iol;on.

This is

~

~niverCal

propor.tion; as we know fr.omthe word

0/1,

pre·

fixed to the Cuhje,q

an;l/Iol,

which denotes that it mull

be taken in its foil extent. H<nce the power of begin.

oing motion, may be affirmed of all the femal fpecies of

animals.

We fee therefore, that

~\I

propofitions are ,ither

~r·

fir lllalilll

or

negalivt;

nor is it lefs evident, that in both

caCes they may be

un;v"fol

or

parlicul..,.

Hence¡arib

Ihat cel.brated fOllrfold divifion of them, into

Ul/iV"fal,

affirmolivt,

and

univerfol mgolivt;po,

'icul.ro

!firlllal;vl,

and

porlicular n'goli..

;

which corn

prehends

indeed all

their mieues. The uCe uf this method of dinrnguiOling

them \ViII appear more fully .fterwards, when IVe cume

10

treat

oC

r«foning aod fyllogifm.

A

parliculor

propor.tion has in

lik~

manner fome gene·

ral term for in fubjca , but with amarkof limitation add–

ed, tOdenotc, that the predicate agrees only

ro

fome of

Ihe iodividuals eomprehended under

~

fpecies, or tO one

or more of the Cpecies belonging tO any genus, aod not to

Ihe Vlhole univerCal ide.. Thus.

fome jI'l/eI are hla·

vi"

Iban iron;

10m,

mm

hove an uncomm.n /ha" of

prudma.

In the la(l of theCe propofiuons, the Cubjca

fomt

mm,

implies only

a

certain number of

individu.ls

,

~omprehended

under a fingle fpecies.

In

the Cormer,

where the Cubjea is a genus, that extends tO a great va–

riety of diflinl! elalfes,

fgt, .. jlontl

may OOt only imply

.ay

numberof particular f1ooes, but airo Ceveral

whol~

fpe·

eies of nones; inafmuch as there maybe not a few, with

Ihe properiy there deCcribed. Heoce we Cee, that apro·

por.tion doesnot ceaCe tO beparticular, by the predicate's

agreeing to

a

whole Cpecies, onleCs that fpecies fingly and

cliflinélly conr.uered, makes alfothe fubj el! of which we

~ffirm

or deny.

Of

a~folule

,nd

C9nJilionalpropojilhnJ.

TH E

objea. about which IVe are chieay converCant iQ

this world, are all of a nature liable to change. What

may be affirmed of themat one time, cannot often at

' 0,

other ; and it makes no Cmall parí

oC

our knowledge, to

diflinguiO\ rightly thefe miations, and Irace the reafons

upon which theydepend. For it is obCcrvable, that amidlt

all the vicillitudes of nature, fOOle things rcmaio conpant

and invariable; nor are even the changes, to which we

fee others liable, effea ed, but in

conf~quencc

of uniCorm

and f1eady lawi, IVhich IVhen known, are Cu/licient tO

di–

rea us in our judgmeots about them. Hence philoCo–

phm, in

din¡ng~;íhing

the objeas ofour perception intB

various elaff,s, have been very careful to oote, that fomo

properties belong e(fentially tO thegeneral

id~a,

fo as

001

tobe Ceparable from it, but by denroying it, very n.ture ;

whil: others

are

only accidental. and may be aHirmed or

denied of it io different Clrcumnanees. Thus, Colidity,

a yellow colour, and great weight, are confidercd as ef·

Cential qualities

oC

gold ; bUI whether it

0\311

exin as an

uoiform conjoioed maf"

is not alike neceffary. We Cee

Ihat, by a proper mennruum, it maybe reuuced tOa fioe

powder

j

and that inteofe. heat will bring il ioto a tlat. of

fur.oo

.

There is Oil\ one Cpecies

d

propor.tioos that remains

10

be defctihed; and which the more deCerve OUTnotice,

as it is not yet agreed among

logici.ns

to which of the

I\VO eI.(f" mentioned

~bove

they ough

t tO be' reCmed,

1

me.n

jingula,

propofitions; or thoCe where the Cubjel!

is

an individu.1. Of this n. ture

are

the following :

¡;,

Haac Newton

""al Ihe il/vUJler'¡ jlllxionl ;

ThiJ

bd

""'.;111

monJ ufr/ul 1'"lhl.

What oceaGoos fome dif·

G

ulty, a. to the proper rank

oC

thefe prupofiti ons, is,

t~al

the Cubjel! being takcn according to the whole ofits

extenfion, theyrumetimes have the fame

d\',1!

in

r~aCon·

ing, as univerfals Dut if it be conr.óercd, that they are

in truth the mofl limited kind of pan,cul" propofitions,

.od th.t no propofition can with any p;opncty loe callcd

univcrC~1.

but where the Cubj,a is fome1I00vuCal idea; wo

(hall not be loogin determining

10

whieh

eI.Cs

they ol1ghtl

10

bereferred. When we

C'y,

S.m, botll (Mlain"ff'"

I,ulh, ;

the propofitiun is rarticuln , bw "Ce thegen,ral

~erm

appear! with anmk

01

rc!lrillion

li thercfulc we

fay,

n"

b,,¡ (DOII";1/I uft{ul " Ulhl;

it is ,vident Ihat

Ihe profoGtion mutl be Ihll more p'arti ular, as

Ih~

"mi·

Fro

m this

diverr.ty

in the Ceveral qualities of thingsl'

arifesacoofi

derable dtfF

erenceas to themanner of our judg–

iog about Ihem. For all Cuch propenies as are infepa–

rabie fromol/jeas, when confideréd as belonging to any

genus or fpecics,

are

affirmed abfolutely and IVithout re·

íerve of that

ge~eral

idea. Thus \Ve f,y,

e old

V")

""eighlJ, o /I'I/e iJ hard, animalJ hov, a

P~lVtr

felf–

II/orion.

But in the caCe of mutable or accidental quali.

ties, as they depend upon Come other confidewion, di·

flinft fromthe gentral idea ; thatalComull be takcn iOlO

Ihe account, in order tO form an accurate jnJgmcnt.

Should

11',

allinn, for ioflance,

oC

fome flones , that they

are

very fuCceptible

oC

a rolling motioo; the propolition

\Vhile it rcm,ins in

t~

general form , eannot

~ ith

any ad–

vantage be introuueed into our reafonings. An aptneCs

to

rece,' ,

th.t

OIO¿~

of mOlion, no\Vs fromthe figure of

lhe nvne; which, as it may varyinfini tel y, our jodgment

then only hecomes arplicable and determinate, wheo the

p.uicul., figure, of which voluhility is

a

confe~uence,

is

.ICo

ta~en

i,,1O the acconnt. Let us thenb,;ngin this o·

tha confider.tion, and the propor.tion will run as

f~l­

Jows:

SIDI t/'¡ a jpL" icol forl/l, ort Mjily pUl il/lo a

"lIil/g ",olion.

!-1m we fec the coodition opon which

Ihe p"..liwe is . l!i rmed, anu therefo,e kno·.I/

in \Vhat

particul." cares the propofition may be apP,licJ.