L
o
G
c.
tation impliedin the u'or¿
IhiJ
is of a more cOII(,ned n.–
ture than in the Cormcr caCe.
l'rorofition,
f .ml
mm
arl ""ife:
for hm wifdonl is not
~Ifirnled
of cvery panicular man, but relb ained tO a few
01'
the human fpecies.
Now flom this
Jiff~rent
appearance of the general i·
dea, th,t coonilUtes the Cubjea of any
judgm~nt,
arifes
the divilion of prupof,tiuns into
ul/iverfal
and
parlicular.
An
ul/iverjal
prupor.tion is that wherein the fubjea is
fome general term, taken in its Cull latituoe, infomuch
Ihat the
pr<dicat~
Agrees 'o all the individuals compre·
hended under it, if it denolesa proper fpecies
i
aod tO all
the CtVeral Cpe i(s, and their inuividuals, if it marks an
idea of a highcr order.
Th~
words
a/l, lV"J, n., n' M,
&c. are the proper figos of this univerfality ; and as they
(ddomfail to
accomp~ny
general t,uths, (o they are the
¡nofl obvious criterion whmby tO .dillinguiíh them .
A/I
anil/la/¡ hove a p01JJer
.¡
b'g;/In;ng 1/Iol;on.
This is
~
~niverCal
propor.tion; as we know fr.omthe word
0/1,
pre·
fixed to the Cuhje,q
an;l/Iol,
which denotes that it mull
be taken in its foil extent. H<nce the power of begin.
oing motion, may be affirmed of all the femal fpecies of
animals.
We fee therefore, that
~\I
propofitions are ,ither
~r·
fir lllalilll
or
negalivt;
nor is it lefs evident, that in both
caCes they may be
un;v"fol
or
parlicul..,.
Hence¡arib
Ihat cel.brated fOllrfold divifion of them, into
Ul/iV"fal,
affirmolivt,
and
univerfol mgolivt;po,
'icul.ro!firlllal;vl,
and
porlicular n'goli..
;
which corn
prehendsindeed all
their mieues. The uCe uf this method of dinrnguiOling
them \ViII appear more fully .fterwards, when IVe cume
10
treat
oC
r«foning aod fyllogifm.
A
parliculor
propor.tion has in
lik~
manner fome gene·
ral term for in fubjca , but with amarkof limitation add–
ed, tOdenotc, that the predicate agrees only
ro
fome of
Ihe iodividuals eomprehended under
~
fpecies, or tO one
or more of the Cpecies belonging tO any genus, aod not to
Ihe Vlhole univerCal ide.. Thus.
fome jI'l/eI are hla·
vi"
Iban iron;
10m,
mm
hove an uncomm.n /ha" of
prudma.
In the la(l of theCe propofiuons, the Cubjca
fomt
mm,
implies only
a
certain number of
individu.ls,
~omprehended
under a fingle fpecies.
In
the Cormer,where the Cubjea is a genus, that extends tO a great va–
riety of diflinl! elalfes,
fgt, .. jlontl
may OOt only imply
.ay
numberof particular f1ooes, but airo Ceveral
whol~
fpe·
eies of nones; inafmuch as there maybe not a few, with
Ihe properiy there deCcribed. Heoce we Cee, that apro·
por.tion doesnot ceaCe tO beparticular, by the predicate's
agreeing to
a
whole Cpecies, onleCs that fpecies fingly and
cliflinélly conr.uered, makes alfothe fubj el! of which we
~ffirm
or deny.
Of
a~folule
,nd
C9nJilionalpropojilhnJ.
TH E
objea. about which IVe are chieay converCant iQ
this world, are all of a nature liable to change. What
may be affirmed of themat one time, cannot often at
' 0,
other ; and it makes no Cmall parí
oC
our knowledge, to
diflinguiO\ rightly thefe miations, and Irace the reafons
upon which theydepend. For it is obCcrvable, that amidlt
all the vicillitudes of nature, fOOle things rcmaio conpant
and invariable; nor are even the changes, to which we
fee others liable, effea ed, but in
conf~quencc
of uniCorm
and f1eady lawi, IVhich IVhen known, are Cu/licient tO
di–
rea us in our judgmeots about them. Hence philoCo–
phm, in
din¡ng~;íhing
the objeas ofour perception intB
various elaff,s, have been very careful to oote, that fomo
properties belong e(fentially tO thegeneral
id~a,
fo as
001
tobe Ceparable from it, but by denroying it, very n.ture ;
whil: others
are
only accidental. and may be aHirmed or
denied of it io different Clrcumnanees. Thus, Colidity,
a yellow colour, and great weight, are confidercd as ef·
Cential qualities
oC
gold ; bUI whether it
0\311
exin as an
uoiform conjoioed maf"
is not alike neceffary. We Cee
Ihat, by a proper mennruum, it maybe reuuced tOa fioe
powder
j
and that inteofe. heat will bring il ioto a tlat. of
fur.oo.
There is Oil\ one Cpecies
d
propor.tioos that remains
10
be defctihed; and which the more deCerve OUTnotice,
as it is not yet agreed among
logici.nsto which of the
I\VO eI.(f" mentioned
~bove
they ought tO be' reCmed,
1
me.n
jingula,
propofitions; or thoCe where the Cubjel!
is
an individu.1. Of this n. ture
are
the following :
¡;,
Haac Newton
""al Ihe il/vUJler'¡ jlllxionl ;
ThiJ
bd
""'.;111
monJ ufr/ul 1'"lhl.
What oceaGoos fome dif·
G
ulty, a. to the proper rank
oC
thefe prupofiti ons, is,
t~al
the Cubjel! being takcn according to the whole ofits
extenfion, theyrumetimes have the fame
d\',1!
in
r~aCon·
ing, as univerfals Dut if it be conr.óercd, that they are
in truth the mofl limited kind of pan,cul" propofitions,
.od th.t no propofition can with any p;opncty loe callcd
univcrC~1.
but where the Cubj,a is fome1I00vuCal idea; wo
(hall not be loogin determining
10
whieh
eI.Csthey ol1ghtl
10
bereferred. When we
C'y,
S.m, botll (Mlain"ff'"
I,ulh, ;
the propofitiun is rarticuln , bw "Ce thegen,ral
~erm
appear! with anmk
01
rc!lrillion
li thercfulc we
fay,
n"
b,,¡ (DOII";1/I uft{ul " Ulhl;
it is ,vident Ihat
Ihe profoGtion mutl be Ihll more p'arti ular, as
Ih~
"mi·
From this
diverr.tyin the Ceveral qualities of thingsl'
arifesacoofi
derable dtfFerenceas to themanner of our judg–
iog about Ihem. For all Cuch propenies as are infepa–
rabie fromol/jeas, when confideréd as belonging to any
genus or fpecics,
are
affirmed abfolutely and IVithout re·
íerve of that
ge~eral
idea. Thus \Ve f,y,
e old
j¡
V")
""eighlJ, o /I'I/e iJ hard, animalJ hov, a
P~lVtr
.¡
felf–
II/orion.
But in the caCe of mutable or accidental quali.
ties, as they depend upon Come other confidewion, di·
flinft fromthe gentral idea ; thatalComull be takcn iOlO
Ihe account, in order tO form an accurate jnJgmcnt.
Should
11',
allinn, for ioflance,
oC
fome flones , that they
are
very fuCceptible
oC
a rolling motioo; the propolition
\Vhile it rcm,ins in
t~
general form , eannot
~ ith
any ad–
vantage be introuueed into our reafonings. An aptneCs
to
rece,' ,
th.t
OIO¿~
of mOlion, no\Vs fromthe figure of
lhe nvne; which, as it may varyinfini tel y, our jodgment
then only hecomes arplicable and determinate, wheo the
p.uicul., figure, of which voluhility is
a
confe~uence,
is
.ICo
ta~en
i,,1O the acconnt. Let us thenb,;ngin this o·
tha confider.tion, and the propor.tion will run as
f~l
Jows:
SIDI t/'¡ a jpL" icol forl/l, ort Mjily pUl il/lo a
"lIil/g ",olion.
!-1m we fec the coodition opon which
Ihe p"..liwe is . l!i rmed, anu therefo,e kno·.I/
in \Vhat
particul." cares the propofition may be apP,licJ.