L
o
'~nd
m.!al\ions, \vhieh beiog nolV palt, and having
00
longer any exillenee, eould not lVithout this eonveyanee,
ha,'e faU,o under our eognizaoee.
, Here then we,hove lhree fouodations of human judg–
ment, froOl whieh lhe "hole
f~lIem
oE
our knolVledge
may with
e.feand advaouge be derived. Firlt,
in/,';·
,/ion,
which refpeéls our ideas themfelves, aod Iheir re–
Iatioos, aod is the
foun~ation
of that fpeeies of reafooiog,
\Vhieh \Ve eall
da/lo/ljlra(ion.
For wlmever is dedueed
'froOl pur iotuitive pmeptions, by a clear aod eonoeélive
{eries of proofs, is faid to be demor.llrated, aod produ·
ces abfolOle eeminly in the mind. HeneeIhe koowledge
obtained in this maooer, is what we properly term
fei.
'enee;
beeaufein " ery lIep of the procedure, it carries its
o~
n evideoee along witlt it, and leaves no room for doubt
or htrttatioo, And, what is highly \Vonhy of notiee, as
the trulhs of this
c1~fs
exp"rs Ihe relations between our
ideas, and the fame relalioos moll ever and invariably
fubC,1I hetweenthe fame ideas, our deduélioos io the way
of feienee, eooflitute what we eaU eternal, oeeelrary, aod
immutable truths , If it he Irue that Ihe whole is equal
'to
aU ils pans, it mull be fo unehangeably; beeaure the
Telatioo of equalily being attaehed to the ideos them·
felves, mufl ever intervenewhere Ihe fame ideas are eom·
pared. Of Ihis oature are alllhe truths of nalural reli·
gion, morality, and mathematieks, aod io geoeral, whal–
'ever may be galhered from the bare view and eoofidemion
of our ideas.
The feeond grouod of human judgment is
txp"ienu ;
from whieh we infer the exiflenee of Ihofe objeéls Ihal
{urround us, and fall under the immediate notiee of our
feofu . When we fee tbe fun, or eafl our eyes lowards
11
building, lVe nOI only have ideas of thefe objeéls with·
'in ourrelves, bUI aferibe to Ihem a real exiflenee OUI of
lhe mind. It is alfo by the information of the feofes,
lhat we judge of Ih qualities of bodies ; as when we fay
that fnow is white, firc hOI, or fleel hard. For as we
are \Vholy tinaequainted wilh the internal Itruélure and
(oollilUlionof the bodies that produ,:e thefefenfations in
us, and are unable to trace any eonn,élion between that
f1ruélure aod the feof,tions themf,lves, it is evident, that
we build our judgments altogether upon obfervation, a·
[cribing
10
bodles fueh qualities, as areanfwerable
10
Ihe
pereeplions they excite in uso BUI this is not the ooly
advantage derÍl'ed from experienee; for we are likewile
indebted to it for all our knowlcdge regarding the co·
exillepee of fenfible qualities in objcéls, and the opm·
tions of boJics one uponanolhee. Ivory, for inflanee, is
hard and elanie ; thi. IVe knowby experience, and in–
deed by that alone, For being allogelher flrangers
10
Ihe rrue n" nre both of elaflieilY .nd hardnefs. we can,
Dot by the bare contemplation of Our ideas demntine,
howfar thepne 'necdraril), implies the olher, or wherher
lhere maynot be a repugnance between Ihem. But " hen
we obrerve them
10
exil! bOlh in the fame obje8, IVe are
Ihen , lrurcd from experíenee, lhat they are not incom·
patible; and when we alfo find that a Oone is hard and
not elaOie, and that ai r Ihr,uth dallie is not hard,
we alfo conelude upon Ihe fame fnundation,
th~t
rhe i.
dcas are nnt nertlr"ily conjnined; but may exill fepa–
rarely in ddfm nt ohjcéls. In like maDDer with regard
VeLo11. N° 68.
2
G
c.
to the opemions of bodies one úpon anofher; ir is n i:
dent, that our knowledge this way, is all dcrived froO!
obfervarion.
Aq/lfl rrgia
dilrolv,s gold, as has beln
found by frequent trial, nor is there any olher
wq
of
arriving at tbe difeovery. Naturalills may tell us ifrhey
pleafe, that the parlS of
aqua rrgia
are of a teXlure apt
to infinuale between the corpufdes of gold, aod thueby
loofen and Olake tbemafunder. If Ihis is a lrue aceoont
of the maner, lVe believe it \ViII ootwilhllanding be al–
lowed, that our conj,8ore in regard to the conformalion
of thefe bodies is dcdueed from the expcriment, and OOt
the experimeot from the conjeélure.
Ir
was not from
any previous knowledge of the intintate flru8ure of
a–
qua rrgia
and
g./d,
aod the aptncfs of Iheir pans to aél
or be aéled upon, thar: IVe carne by the conclufion ábove
Olentioned. The internal eonflilution of bodies is in a
manner IVholly unknolVn to us, and eould lVe cveo fur'
mount rhis dlfficulty, yet as the f' patatioo of lhe parts
of gold, impliesfomethiog likean aéli.e force in the
111m·
jlruul/J,
and IVe are unable to eooeeive ho\V it come3 to
be polrelfed of litis aélivity; the e[ ,él mufl
be
owned' to
be altogether beyond our comprehenfion, But IVhen re–
pealed trials had once confi rmed it, iofontuch that it \'las
admitted as ao eflablilhed IrUlh in natural knowledge, ir
IVas theneafy for men, to fpin out theories of their oIVn
invention, and contrive fuch a IIruaure of pans, both for
go/d
and
gqlla ngia,
as would befl
ferv~
to explain 'he
phznomenoo, upon Ihe priDeiples of that fyllemof phi.
lofophy they had adopted.
From IVhal has
b~eD
[aidit is evident, that as inlui:ioD
is the foundation of what we calJ
feitnlijica/
knolVkJge,
fo is experienee of
na/llra/.
For this lall, being wholly
laken op wilh obje8s of feofe, or thofe bndies that COD–
Rilute the natural world; ando their propenies, as far as
IVe can difeover them, being tO be traced only by a long
and paioful feriesof obfervatioDs,
ir
i~
'pparent, that in
order to improve this branch of knowledge, we mull be–
take ourfelves to the method of
tt
ial and experimento
But though experienee is \Vhat IVe may term the ¡m–
mediate found.tion of natural kno\Vledge, yet with re–
rpea to particular perfons, its influenee is very narrow
and eonfined, The bodies that furround us are numc.
rous, many of them lie at a great dillanee, ,nd
fom~
quite beyond ourre" h. Life toois Ihort, and focrouded
\Vith cares, thar but liule time is left for any fingle man
to employ himfelf in 'unfolding Ihe mylleries of nature.
Henee it is necelrary tO admit many things upon the te.
flimooy of others, whieh hy this meansbecomes thefoun–
dation of a great rart of our knoivledge of body. No
mandoubts of the po\V" of
nqlla rrgia
to dilrolve gold,
Ihough perhaps he never hi"lfdf n"lde Ihe experimento
In thefe therefore and fu eh like cafes, we judge of the
fa-éls and opera;ions of nature, upon the mm ground of
ttllimony. However, as we eanalw,ys have rccourfe lO
experi, nce, whm any dO\lbt or feruple arifes, litis is
julUy confidmd as thetrue foundationcfnatural philofo.
phy; being indeed Ihe ultimate fuppon upon \Vhieh ouf
alrent rens, and \Vhereto
~¡e
appeal,
~
henthehighdl de·
gree of evidenee is required.
Bu: Ihere are many faéls Ihat will not allow of an aro
peal to the feofes, aod,in this eafe Idlimony is Ihe \lue
t
10
Q.
aod