M E D
58 )
M E· D
as extremes; in which fenfe it is oppofed to immedi–
:ne.
MEDI CAGO, in botan'y, a genlls of the diadelphia de–
cilndria elaCs . The pod is compreffed; and
th~
cui·
na of the coroll. decline, from the vexillum. T aere
M E
D
1
M
EDICINE
i~
generall y deG ned tO be, T he art of
preferviog heahh when prefect, and of ren.,ring it
wben 10Cl.
~1en
would never think of any
panicular
regimen or
mode of living. in order to pref<rve health, before they
felt the pain, whieh aeeompany the \Vant it. The firll
paioful fenfation muCl neeelfarily have produeed a d<Gre
for relief. But 'in a puiod when
phyfiei.nsand medio
cines were equally unknown, how was that reJief to be
obtairied! or what f)'Clem of .eonduél
wo~mao
in this
fimatioD
naturally follow? Whoever
CdO anfwer
theCe
queClions, wi!l unfold the genuine principies of the medi–
cal art, and give an inf.!lible flanda rd for judgi ng
'v.ha<prpgref!
s beco made in tbe
improvement
of
it,
what
particular circumChnces
have
contributed
tO
obarua
Or
forward th. knowledge and cure of difeafes.
M edieioe being thus founded on a powerful inClin(l in
human
natuTe,
iu
exifience in fome form
mua
have beeo
eoev.1 with the firCl difeafe that app<ared .mong mankind.
Moa
ares requiTe
the
experience of ages
befare they
can
arrive at a high degree of perfeétion. Medicine is un–
queClionably one of the moCl aneient; and eonfequeDdy,
the improvement of
it
might be expeéled to bear fome
proportion to its 31ltiquity.
BUl,
whilIl: philofophy,
in
aH its branches, hí\S beeo cultivated and improved
to
a
great exrent; medicine, notwithllanding (he collateral ad·
vantages ir has of late derived (rom
3natomy
and other
feienees, Clill eODtinuts to be buried in rubbifl, and obfeu–
rit)'.
~1any
c::luCes have contributcd to
retud
our progrc(s
10
the knowledge of the caufes and cure of difeafes. In the
carly ages. prefcriptions were either the reCull of tradi·
t iOD
founded upon uncertain faé'ts, or mere random tríals
witbout any ralional view of fuccefs: Accordingly, when
any unCommon edfe occurred, [he patienls \Vere placed in
crofs.ways, and cther public places,
to
receive
lhe
advice
of p.lfengers who might ehanee to know the direafe or an
efficacious remedy. In this '.I.'ay valuable medicines might
beaccident¡¡)Jydircovered. BUl memory, and, in
remar
k-
2ble cures, engravings
00
pillan or the walls of temples,
were poor infirumems for recording the fymptoms of dif–
eafes, and the ingredienls of prercriptions.
After the kno\Vledge of medicine began to be Cludied
2nd pra(lifed as a liberal profcllion, a jealoufy of reputa·
tion, joined to a lhirf1: for money and ignorance vf phi–
lofophy, laid • folid (oundation for medieal difputation.
On. party of phyr.eiaos, kno\Vn by the name of Empy .
rícs, exc1udcd aB reafoning, and lrurled fol ely to experi.
(ncc. Anuther pany, caBed D ogmatifls, maintained, that
DO
m¡n ought tO pre[eribe, without bcing able tO
give
a
are ntoe fpectcs , tour of them natives of Britaio,
vlt:.
The f.dcat.l, or ydlow !TI(!dic ; the:: raliva, or lucern ; lhe
lupulina. or meltlot trcfoil¡ and lhe arabica, or he¿rt–
t r<foll.
e
1
N
E.
theory bOlh of the difeafe and of the nature and aélion of
the medicine. Tltis dirpute cootlnued for ages, and , like
othcr dirputcG of a fimilar o.tture, remaios Hill in fome
meafure undccided.
Tite
principies of both theCe p:uties
are unquellionably good . But the phyr.cian who exclud..
either-of lhem, wdl make bUI liule progreCs io rhe know–
ledge of his profellion .
A
judieious mixtu re of the tWO
is indifpeofably nececruy. Jodeed it is diffieult tO deter–
mine whether tOO e,rc:at an attacbmeot to empyrici(m or
dogmatifm h.s eontributed mo(l tO obClru(l the improve–
ment of phyr.e.
But there is one caufe which has operated more power–
flllJy .i.g, prevenring the improvement of medici ne than e·
ven a combinatioo of all the other caufes. Moll branches
of philofophy are princip.lly eultiva:ed by people who ex–
pe8 thei r reward in repur3tion. not io money. The prac·
tice of phyfic is become as literaJly a trade as any branch
of bufinefs whatever. Young meo are [aught phy(jc with
no other view rhan that of gitining their bread . When·
ever a phyfician gets ioto extenfive prattice. he may
buClle and
m.kea noire; but, even fuppoGng his abili.ties
to be great, he can never fiad leifure la thiok, or digefl.
his obfervations.
Another eaufe of the imperfell na.. of medicine .rif.o
from rhe varicties in conrlitutions, and the co:npléx na–
ture of direafes.. Jt is even extremely difficult, after
él
direare has been cured, tO determine with certaioty, whe–
lher the cure was performed by the operadon of nature,
or by any particular virtue in the medicine. T'his di/ficul–
ty is gre..¡ tly increarc:d by the variety of difFercnt medicines,
and different iogredients in lhe Carne medicine, ,which are
commonly adminillred during the courre of a di(eare ..
Of lare feveral attempts have beco made to reduce me–
dicine ioto lhe form of a regula.r
(cience,
by diUributi9g
dífe<tfes into c1afTes, orders, genera, and (pecies. Sau–
vage was lhe firll, and indeed the ooly per(on who ever at–
tempted to complete this grcat wOlk. Others. as Lin–
o:cus. Vogel, D r Cullcn,
Oc.
have unce endeavcured
tO
improve S.tuvage's method of cl.lffing; but [hey have coo–
tented themrelves with ao enumeratíon of the charaéters
and arrangement of the difFerent
genera~
withoul enter·
ing
jotO
their hillory or cure. S.lUvage eOumerates
315.
genera, Linn",us
325.
Vogel
560,
and Dr Cullenhas re–
dueed lhem tO
132,
The bare infpe(lion of thefe num–
bers rhews, th:u phyricians are far from being agrecd with
r'cg;nd to what conflitutes the geocric or fpecific charac·
tels of a difl.!afe. l odc:ed, we may venture tO affirm, lhat
tJ\ey
never will agree upon this pOlnt: T he diagnollic
fytnl'toms of difeafes are not fo eafily difeovered as the Cla–
miDa
or pctlls in a Iluwer, or lhe Dumber of teeth or toes
in