M Y T
Ihat the firll heatheo, dei6ed Ihofe
gr.atmeo to whom
Ihe reíl of mankind were indebled for any fignal bener... ,
as J upiter, Apollo, Cere" Baeehus, Hereule., .tEfeula .
píus,
ee.
in order ro induce others,
35
we1l of rhe pre–
fenc as fUlure ages, to reverence and to imitare rhent.
Would
nOl
a" ancient p,,¡ an.
ir
he were ro returo upon
the eanh, have Cpecious
argu01ents,
ar
lean,
tO
fupport
bis religioo, when he f.w weak mortal, bea,ify or
c~·
nonize
J
merely
by
rheir owo authority, other weak mor ·
tals (frequently mere pedaots,) and place them in
heClven,
.withoul Ihe permiflion or approba,ion of Ihe S upremo
B<Íng? H appy is il for mankind, ,.hen al different ,imes
f,¡¡aeious pontiffs pur;:. Ihe calendar, and ,he braio.
of Ihe pcople, from a herd of prelended f.inlS, aod pre·
vcnt them,
al
leatl artcr.their death , from doing ¡oju ry
10
foeielY, by interrup,ing Ihe induílry of ,he I.oorious
inhabitao.. wilh keepiog thei r fe(¡iv , ls.
The ,hird religion was idolatry, or ,he religion of the
populaee. For ,he eommon people, born 'o be deeei ved
in every thing, confounding in lheir imagi nations rhe Ha ..
tues of the gods, the ¡dols of lheir divinitles. rhe em–
blems of ,heir virtues and of religiou. wocfhip, Wilh ,he
gods, diviDities, virtues and worfhip themrelvu, adored
theCe im.:.ges , ano proceeded ro extravagandes rhe mon
ridiculous , and frequ eotry moll
crimio~l,
in thei r
cere–
monies, fea(ts, libl lioilS, facdfices,
6c.
h is tO be rear.
ed, tliat, as long a.. there are upon the eanh men of ou r
Jimi,ed eapaci,ies, ,his triple religion will cooíl.ody fub.
(irl
under éi!feren, fo rms; and we are mueh deeeived, if
it may not be fo und under lh'e empire of ChriílianilY it
felf, oo,wilhílandiog the puri,y of its dotlrioe.
1,
will
be eafily eoneeived, ,ha, it is
00'
of the religioo
01
phi .
lofo phers , oor ,h., of Ihe populaee, of whieh we
are.totre'l in Ihi. a"icle of My'hology; but of lhat whieh
fubfiíled uoder Ihe authori'yof lhe m.giCl"ey and the prieíl.
hood, and
eonfe~uen(ly
of paganifm io general.
As far as we ac ••ble to judge by all ,he aocient au–
thors \Ve have read, the
pagans
adored
~he
fovereign L ord
of the univerfe unGer tbe Dame of
Fa/~
or
Dtjlin),
which
)Ve mull not confound "",¡th
ForlulI~.
",ho was regarued
os a
fubah ero di. inity . J upiler himfelf, all ,he gods,
every animltcd ueing, the heavens , the eanh , the whole
frame of nature, was fub(ervient ro D etli ny, and nothiog
could reverfe iu deeree.. This divioi,y
WdS
fo highl y
adorable, as to b« above 01.11 rank; and was
reg~rdcd
as
t oo fupreme
10
be rep,tfenled uoder any fenfible image or
{!atue, or..to have any temple ereéted for iu worfhip. We
do not remember to have read, that Qny Cacrifice \Vas e–
"'er ofFered ta lhis Dd liny, or that any temple orcity was
~ver
dediuteu to i15 oame.
We
are almon inclined to
thiok, that ,he pagan. were fenfi ble; tha, lhe ,em ple and
lbe worlhip of ,he Cod of gods ought lo be in the heart
of mean . r-..1e-ntion is made, indeed. of a temple tltat was
dedicated tOthe
U
nknown God, but \Ve are ignorant whe.
Ihcr or not Deflioy were.lhereby meanl. 'Ve muíl not
coofou nd ,hi, D eOioy, moreover, \Vilh lhe goddef, cf
chance, of which there are (óme antique (latues
tl~at
re.
preCent her in a
r~cunlb:nt
ponure, and playing with Itr–
tle bones; for tbis
W3S
DorhiDg more than an inventioD
of
fome I[."u",y.
Aflt, ,his ¡;ca:ral and
p~lilof"phieal
idea of lhe Su ·
M Y T
prome Bei og. com!s lh , poG,i ve religioo of the Plj¡.n••
Thi. \Vas eOlirely founded on fable . whieh took ilS Tlfó ei·
lhcr from an::ieo t traditioo, . or hitloricaf evcnts, altereci
or augmen ,ed by Ihe imagi oacions of lhe poelS, by fuper.
Clilion, er by Ihe ereduluy of the pcople; or elfe il eon–
liíled of
.!I~goric
or moral fiélioos.
A
erowd of wri,ers,
and among ,h. reíl
N. d 1,
e.ml',
(Natalis Co:nes,) ,b,
.bbou Bannie r aod Plueh.,
&e
have nude ml oy ro·
fearehes ioto lhe odgin o, fable : and 'hey ,hiok: Ihey
bave diCcoyered in Cource,
l .
in the
,anity
of m.ankind ;
2 .
iD ,be wao, of Jellers and charaéle,, ;
3.
in ,he oelu ·
five
eloqueoce of oratars;
4.
in the relatlong of tr.nel·
Jers;
5. iD
rhe 6étions of poets, painters. ll:atuaries,
aód
dramatic writers;
6.
io the divedity and unif\)rmity of
oamea ; , . io lhe igoorance of Irue philofophy;
8.
in·,he
foundatioo of colonies, aod
tr}(~
,¡oyendon of arts; 9.
iD
lhe defire of having gods for our aDeeílors ;
10.
in ,he
iOlperfeél or f.lfe
m..
rpretation of the boly ferip,ures;.
] l .
in (he ignorance of ancient hifiory;
12.
in a like ig.
noranee of eh ronology;
13,
in tha.t of foreign laoguages;
14'
in the Innflacion of ,he religion of the Egyptiaos aod
PhCEnicians into Greece;
15 .
in the ignorance of geo·
graphy; and ,
16.
in ,he belief tI,al Ihe firel people had of
the intercourCe of gods wi th men o
It
is cena'n, that all
thefe matters rakl!n together are fufficieo t tOproduce f11a ...
oy Ihoufand, of f.bles; are more ,han fuffieient tOeoable
us to deceive ourreh'es and otheu, and to give rire
tO
in-
6nite reyeries. Bu r we thould take care how we dra w
froOl
Ih.refourees demooílr.tioos th.., migh ' be ured: by
¡olidels, as arguments too\'erthrow the hittory of the jews;
a people lhe moíl ílupid, moíl eredulous, and oll.o..,iou.
of all olhers! lo lhe mean ,ime, the p'2an philofophers
,hemfel ves ofTerted, thal it ",as a god who ioveoted
,he
fable: fo much they were cODvincined of its ingenuity,
.nd of ilS Clrong leDdeney
10
ioílruél mankiDd in their
dUly .
Mythology ,herefore, ",..en properly lI ealed, begic.
with making learned reCearches ioto the real origio of
fél·
ble,
uf
pagaolfm, and of tha< idol.ury whieh \Vas its con·
fequeoee .
11
reeurs for this purpole tveo to ,he begiooiog
of ,he world: and .fter "oding ,ba, Laban, the falher.
in·1aw of ,he patriarch Jaccb, was a maker of idols ; and
, ha¡ he had hlS lilde images, Of houOlOld gods, whieh he
formed of b.ked eanh, and whieh -O,e\Vs Ihat idolacry
exífied in the grt!atetl antiquity;
it
then explains
colmog,·
n)'.
and
Ih' .g on)',
or the be lief ,ha"he firíl iobabitaoes of
the earlh entt!rtained of the
crearion
of lhe univerfe, 2nd
\Vha, ,he pag, n ,heology laugbl of lhe geoealogy of their
falfe gods . le Debins \Vilh ,he tradi,ioA of the ChalJeaos, a
people
Co
ancient, that Nimrod
w~s
their fiect king; bUl al
the Came time fo credulolls and Cupernitious, tln t we may
reg.rdIhem as ,he aUlhors of all ,hofe f, bles, a. d Ihe
prop'g.'ors of
.11
thofe vi fioo" lhat have fioee bliodeJ
hum3n rcaron. According ro th is tradition, a monfler
named
Oann:J,
or
O",
half "Ih aou half man,
fpr.ngfrom
,h. fea, before ,he ehaos was eOOlplelely difperfed, aod
gavc b ws
lO
rhe ChaldeAns .
A
W(lman
caBed
O!norl(l.
reigned overall the eanh.
Rtf
cul her in two, aod mOlde of
onc moicty the ht!!::tt'cns, and of Ih\! other lhe cauh. They
Iikewife invented
th~
twOprimitive beings, of which (he
good one, who was naOled
Orafina¡i/",
had lhe diree·
lioD