Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  938 / 1042 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 938 / 1042 Next Page
Page Background

L

Irimony of the ehureh;

tho~gh

it is

eertli~

that tithes,

in thcir infaney. ",ere given. not tO the c1ergyalon:. but

10

laY' Olonks who "ere eal1ed

,aupe,.".

and to'other in·

digent perCons. Charles the

G

reat

w"'

the fidl feculal

Prince \Vho aekno\\l(dged tltis right'in the ehurch, le

appears to have beco reccived wlrh us. as far back

¡j

David

1.

2 ,

The perfon eOlployed by aeathedral church or,mona·

flery to felve the cure in lny chureh annexed, was cal1ed

a viear, becaufe he hcld the church. not in hisown right,

but 1n the right or

vice

of his employers; and fo IVa;

re01ove'able at pleafure. and had no fhare of the bene6ce,

other tllln what they Ihought fit to allow him: BUI, ió

Ihe courfe of time, the appellalioo of vicar was Iimited

lo thofe who were made perpetual. and who got a Hmd

fhare of tbe benefice for their incumbeney; from whencé

arofe lhe diltinélion of bene6ces into pa'rfooages aod vi·

carages.

3.

Parfonage.teinds are the teinds of coro; and they

are fo called bccaufe they are 'due to the parfoo 'or olher

litulu of the benefice. Vicarage,teinds are the fmall

leinds of calves, lint, hemp, eggs,

&c.

which were como

monly given by tbe titular to tbe vicar who ferved the

cure in his place. The firfl fort was uoiverf.lly due. un·

lefs in Ihe cafe of their infeudatioo to laics, or of a pon·

tifical exemption; but. by the cufloms of.almofl all Chri·

lIendom. the Idrer teinds were oot demaoded wheré

Ihey had DOt been in ufe to be paid. By the praélice of

Scotlaod, the teinds of animals.

or

of things produced

from animals. as lambs. wool, calves, are due tbough

not accuP.omed to be paid; but roots, herbs,

&c.

are

not tithable. uolefs ufe of payment be proved: nei·

Iher are perfonal teinds,

i.

t.

tbe teolh of what une

acquires by his. own induflry, acknowledged ' by our

law ; yet they have beeo fouod due, wheo fupJlOrted

by

-40

year5 pofl'ellion.

4'

Tite parfon who was sotided tO the tcind of corOl,

made his right efFeélual either by aceepting of a eenaio

Dumber of teiod·bolls yearly from the proprietor, io fa·

1isfaélion of it; or more frequeody, by

dra~ing

or fe·.

paraling upon the 6eld his owo teoth pan of the coros,

after they wele reaped. from the flock or the remaioing

oine tenlhs of the erop, aod carrying il off to his owo

granaries; whieh is ealled drawn teind.

S.

After the reformation, James V!.

cQofid~red

him·

relf as proprietor of all the ehurch·lan·ds; partly beeaufe

Ihe purpofes for which they had been granted were de·

c\ared fuperllitious; and partly. io confequenee of the

refignalions which he. and

<t.

Muyhis mother. had pro·

eured from the beneficiaries: andeveD as to theteiods, tho'

our reformed c\ergy alfo c\aimed them as the patrimony

of the 'chureh, our fovereign did oot fubmil to that

doélrine farther than extended to a coo'petent prc·

viGon for

minifl~rs.

He therefore ereéled Or fecula·

rifed feveral abbacies and priories inlo tempor.1 lord·

fhips; the granlees of

~hich ~ere

ealled fometimes

lor~,

of ereélion. •nd fomCllmes tltulars. as havlOg hy thm

grants Ihe fame lidc to the

ereél~d

beoeúces, that Ihe

monafleries had fo.merly,

6.

As the erolVn's revenueruffered greatly hy thefe e·

:cllions, the temporalilY of al! cburch,bcoe6m

(i.

t.

A

w.

chureh lands) ms. by t

S87.

C.

29.

~no~xed

to thé

crown . TilO! llalute excepts fromIhe onnexation fuclí

ben!fiees as "ert ellabldhed bdore the .eformalion

iti

laymen, whofe rights the legilldlure had 00 inlcnlion

10

Il'eaken. Not.'ilhUanding this flalute, hisMajelly con'

tinucd to make fanher ereélions. IV/uch were declared

oul! by

1592,

e,

119,

with an' cxception of fuch as had

been made

10

f.vour of lords of parliameot, finee Ihe

genenl aél of annexation in t¡a7.

7,

K. Charles

1.

fooo after his fuccellion, raifed a re·

duélion of al! thefe m élioos. whether ganled before or

afler the aél of . nnexatiolt, upon the grounds meotiooed

atlenglh by Mr Forbes io his treatife of tithes, p. t

59.

At lall the \Vhole matter was refmed to the Kiog him·

felf by four feveral fubmilJioos or eompromife., io whicb'

the parties on one fide

Wer<

the titulau aod their uckf.

meno the bilhops with tbe inferior elergy, ond the royal

boroughs, for theinterell they had in theteiods that wm

gifled fortbe provifion of

mioin~rs,

fchools, or hofpital,

within their boroughs; and, on the other part, Ihe

pro~

prietors IVho wanted tO have the leadiog of their own

teiod, The fwhmillioo by,the titulm coouined ofu rren·

der into his Maj<fly's nands of Ihe fuperioritie. of their

feveral ereélioo••

8. Upoo mh of thefe fubmiffioos his Majefly pro·

nouneed fepante decrees·orbritral, dmd Sept.

2. 1629,

which are fubjoined to the aéls of

par1iam~nr

ofhis reign:

Hemade it Ia:wful to proprietor. to fue Ihe titulars for

a

valuation, and if theythought 6t for o fale alfo, of theit

leiods, before the eommilJionm named or to be oamed for

that purpofe. The rate of tejnd, wheo it was poffeffed

by the proprietor jointly with the flock. for payruent of

i

eenaio duty to the titular; aod fo did

001

admit a fepame

valuation, was 6xed at a Jifth part of the eonflant ymly

rent, which was, accounted oreafonahle

furrogG/u""

io

place of a tenth of tbe ineieafe, Where it was drawo

by the tilular. aod eoofeqoeotly might hevalued feparate'

Iy fromIhe 1I0ck, it was to be valued as il! extent fhould

be afcenained upoo a proof before Ihe eommillioners

i

but in this lan valuation, Ihe Kiog direlled the 6fth part

to be deduéled (rom !he proved teind, io favour of Ihe

proprietor, which was \herefore called the King's eafe;

The proprietor fuing for a valuation gets the leading

of his own teinds as foon as his tuit commenees; prO"

viding he does not allolV proteGation to he eXlraéled

a'

gain~

himSor not iofifliog. .

.

9.

Whm the proprietor Infifled alfo for a fale of

hl~

teinds, the titular

\Vas

obliged tO fell lhem at oine year,

purchafe of the nlued teind·duIY. lf the purfuer had

a tackofhis owo teindl, not yet expired; or if Ihe de·

fender was ooly tackfOleo of the teinds, and fo could nOI

give Ihe purfuer ao heritable right; an abmmeot of the

priee was to be graoted aecordingly by the eommi!:

fioners.

10.

There

Í!

no provifion io Ihe decrm·arbitral, for

fellinn the leinds granted for lb.

fufltntati~n

of mioiflm,

uni"err.,ies, fchooLs or hofpinls; becaufe thefe "'ere

10

con·

linue,

as

aperpetual fundo fOrlhe m.intenaneeofIhe perfons

or fo:ietics to whomtbey were apprupriated; and they are

exprefsly dcc\arcd not fubjeél lo flle, by t690. r. 30.-

1693,

C.

23. By

th~

I.!I of thefe

~éls,

it is alfu pro·

vid:d