L
A
W.
and compreheods al! the dUlies we owe either to lhe Su–
premo
BtÍn~.
10 ou&lv<s. or toour ncighbour; as re·
,~reoee
10 God, feli-Jefenee. t<mpcranee. honour tO our
par~ols,
beoevolenee to all, a IIriél
adhercne~
to our
engagemenlS, gwitude.
Ot.
The I¿w of omlre, where
jt ei!her eommands or forbids, is immutahle; and caooot
be controlled by aoy
hum~o
aUlhorily; but ,where Ihat
bIV does
00
more than coofer a riglu, wilhout obligiog
us to ufe it, the fupreme power may divell us lhereof, io
whole or in parto
•
2.
The laIV of nations is airo the refult of reafen, aod
hu
God for il! author ; but it fuppofes maokiod formed
ioto flveral bodies polilÍe, or 'Ilales; and comprifes all
Ibe duties which one Ilate owes 10 aoother. Thefe mull
of neceffity be fimilar tO the dUlÍes aÍifing belweeo iodi·
,idu~ls,
fince both are diélated by reafoo; fo that what
is ,Ihe laIV of nalure when applied 10 meo confidmd
limplyas fueh, is indeed lhe law ,of oalions \IIheo ap–
plied
10
kiogdoms or Ilates_
From Ihis fOijree, pro–
cced the riglm ofwar, Ihe fecurilY of amball'adors, Ihe
obligalioos ariGog from ([eaties,
Oc.
The particu–
lar ufages
oE
oalions iD !heir'mUlual eorrefpoodeoee
whieh are not ne,elf.,ilyfOllnded io reafon, ate no part
óf the laIV of nations io its proper fenfe: for they are
arbitrary, and derive their fole allthority from compaél,
cither exprefs or prefumed; and may therefore, without
violating'the lalV of nature. be altered, For this reafon,
they ought tO be throwo inlo
thecI.fsof pofitive laws,
whofe obligation lalls DO long:r than lhe agreement upon
whieh it
IS
fouoded, Of this fort, are the eeremooial
ufed io reeeiving and eotertaioing ambalf¿dors, lhe prí–
vilegcs indulged
(O
fome of their fmanlS, the rtlle, ob–
ferved in carlels for exebanging prifonm of w¿r,
tu,
3.
Civilor munieipallaw. is tbat whieh every fo'mign
kiogdom or
11m
has appropriated to ilfelf, The ap–
pellation of municipal was origioally eonr,ned to Ihe la"S'
of
1/Junicipio,
or dependent Ilates; but it eame by degree"
to fignify all civillaws wilhout di(fioélion. No fovereign
l!al. can
f~bfill
without a fu preme powe!, or a right of
commanding in the lan refort; lhefupreme power of one
age cannot therefole be fellered
by
any ena8mer,1 of a
f~rnter
age, otherwife it would ceafe to be fupreme.
Heoee the laIV lall iDdale t1erog¡tes froOl prior !lws. •
PRINCIPLES ' oF TH¡LAW or' S,COT'LAND,
Title l.
General ObferuntionJ.
l.
THI munieipallaw of Scotland. as of mol! othe,r
countries, confias partir of /lat"tory or written law,
which has tbe exprefs authorílY,of the legiOative pOll/er ;
partly of eullomary or uowritten law, ,whieh derives force
from its prefumed or tatÍl eonCeot.
2.
Uoder our Ilatutory or writteo laIV i!Compreheoded.
(.l.)
Our aéls of parliameot : oot only thoCe which \lIere
made in tbe reigo' of James
1.
of Scotland, .and from
thenee down to Gur union wilh England in
17M,
but
fuéh of the B,ilifh Ilatutes enaéled fioee lhe uoioo as coo–
'uro
Ibi, par! of lhe united kingdom.
~.
The
remaios of our aoeient wriueo la" were pu–
blifhed by Sir John Skeoe c1erk-regifier, inthe begioning
of the lall century, by lieenee of parliament. The books
of
Rt¡ia/n Mojtjlo/,m.
to ' whieh lhe \Vhole colleDioo
owes Its title, feem to be a ffllem of Seots law, IVriueo
by a private lawyer at the eommand of Divid
1.;
and
lbough no expreCs eon6rmation of that Irealife bf the
JegiOalure appears, yet it is admitted to have been the
ancient Iaw of our kingdom hy exprefs Ilmtcs, The
horough-Iaws, which were alCo eoaéled by the fame king–
David, aDd Ihe /latutes of William, Alexander
'll .
David
n.
and!he Ihree Roberts, are ugivcrfally allowed
10
be genuine. Our parliaments have once aod agaio ap–
poioted commiJIions to revife and amend the
R'gio/n Ma,
jtj/a/,m,
aod the other ancienl books of our law, and
10
make their report: but; as no report
~ppears
to have
Ken made, oor eonfequeotly any ratification by parlia–
ment, oone of Ihefe remains ore reeeived, as of proper
ao!hority, in our eouit! ; yet Ihey are of exe!!lent ufe.
ía
proving aod iIIullrating our moll 'aneient eufloms.
4.
Our \Vriuen law eomprehends.
(2 ,)
The aél, of Ce·
cltrllllt, wbieh are ordinanccs for re&.ulaliog.the form, of
proeeeding 'before the court of feffion ' in the ;dmioi·
Itration of juOiee, made by the judge., wbo h. ve adele–
gated power from the legiOaturefor that purpofe. SOOle
of. thefe aéls dip upop ma,tter, of righl, "hich declare
what tbe judges apprehend to be rhe law of S'eotland,
and what they are tO obferve afterwards as
a
lule of
judgmeot. .
S.
The ei,il or Roman aoó canon
Jau's,
tbough they
are nOl perltaps to be deemed proper pans of our wril–
'ten law, have undoubtedly haJ lhe greatefl influenee io
Seotlaod. •The pOl\'eTS exercifed
~)'
our fovereigns aod
judg.. have beco, juftified upoo, no other grounó, Ihan
that lhey lI'ere conformable tO tlie 'ei,il or canon lawl;
and
a
fpecialllatme wa! judgeJ neeelfary, upon Ihe refor–
mation, 10 refeind fuch of their eonllllotioos
:u
W<re
repugnanl tÓ the Prolellant doarine. FromIhat period,
the canon laIV
Itas
been Jiule refpeéled, exeep' in que–
flions of tithes. patronages, and fome feIV more anieles
of eccler,allieal right: But lite Romancontinues to have
great authorilY in all cales where il
15
oot derogated
Irom by Qatmc or eullom, and \Vhere the g;oius of our
law fufren
115
to apply it,
6
Our unwrimn or C'Jíloma,
y
law. is thar which,
withollt beiog exprefsly eoat)ed by
Il~w:e,
de
,i.es1tS
force froOl the taeit eoofent of king and .people; whieh
conrent is prefumtd from the aneient eulloOl of the eom'
m.nity. Cullom,
as
it is equally fouoded in the lVill of
the lawgiver willt w,iuen law, has thercfore the fame
cf–
feéls : Henee, asone Ilatute may be explained by-,aoother,
fo a Ilatute may be exrlaiaed or repealed by the uoiform
praéliee of theeommunil)'. and elCn
&0
into di(u!e by a
poflerior eonlrary cullom. Bllt this
p~wer
of cu(Jem tO
derogate from prior (l;fmes. is genllally eonfi ned by
lawyers to flatlltes
coneernin~
p,il·¡te rir,hl,
~nd
dOt s'
not extend 10 thofe Ilhieh Icoard puhlie pohey.
7.
An