Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  273 / 510 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 273 / 510 Next Page
Page Background

D

IR~D-CAJHLIBVS

LI ER

J.

DISSE T.

IV.

l

7

ro me babeo D. Thornarn, fed

&

co u ru

la-

§

I

J.

Q!!od

aurem

difc urúuum cuam a

1~

l

uenr

m

in

Pra:dicamentis

q.i.

de

quanri-

ftra~at

ab

int

lJeél_iuo_,

le~fi_ciuo,cu1~,

p

r

zfü.

tace.

lll4tame¡¡

(inquicde

diffi

reacia

coníliruti· mapuam

Brura aliquad

parunp

nt

rat1onis,id

ft

ua

Orationis)

no1J efl Rot.t; immd

tJi:t

ali1.:u1us

fpceiei

cognitionis

fe

nfttiuz

docctS.

Thom

s

de

·eri

ta–

fpecialiffi,,,~

efl.

nobis

nota, quia

fi

e/Jet, non poffet

effe

te

quzfl.

.zs.art.2.Sed

vis

1limati

a(inquit)per

qu-'

":lerum quod

d1cit"r

1,

Pofleriorum.

quod

qu~libet

pars

animal

appre/n

dit

intentionts non

accepras

per fenfl

m

ti.efinitionis

debtt efJe

i11

plus

;

omnes

autem

~t¡NC

:

boc

'VI

ar11iciti1m

vel

inimiriftj

inefl

ani~ ftn/itiu~ fuun~

'utem non contfogeret,

fi

vitima differemia effet nota,

dü quod

participar

A/iquid

rationionis,v11de

ratione hw

11s

&c.

Igitur

d;lferenti¡

t1l11~,t

fore

omnium

definiendo...

1flim11tionis

dic11ntur

animalia

quamdt1m

prurJentiam

rum

ignot.e f'4nt.

}iJ!C

illc.

hahere

,

vt pattt in principio Metaphy/icorum

Quod

§.

11,

Oices cum

fvlaf101

nullas

nos cogno•

criam

trad1c

in

1.diíl.16.

q.

12.

~al

bi

fzpc

'011·

fccre d1tfcrenti"s

infim3s

pr.eter vn rn,

&

al ce-

cedic

brucis

a/,quid

rA!ionis,

nempe

fi

nficjuz.

Vi–

ran~

,

Sed

contra;

nec

vnam cognoícimu".

Ro·

de

ecialn e

difcurfu

bruroru

111

NarurJles,

&.

de

~o ~nim

qualis

n m

iUJ

fü~

an

rarion:il

?

n\in1•

Elephaute,

que

Emanucl

Lu!itanjz Rex

Leoni

me:

f(d ello ftr,

de

q~o

infra:

qurenam cft

aire-

X.

Poncifici

Ma

imo

mifit,

Legc

p,

rium Va·

fa? anne

hinnibile?

rugibi e? fed

iíla!

paíliones

kriaoum

Hyerogliphyc.

lib.2.

cap.

1

s,

Vbi

'ideo

quidem funf,

&

proprierar~s,

non

ditfaenci~

mira,atque

vera

de

hac

Bellua ioue

nies,

vt

iam

froprijffim~

..

&

fJmplices.

Plinium,

Plutarchum,

R.lianum,

&e.de

bruto

§.

11.

Sed

&

Rational~ ~tf1..

conceptum

fim~

rum

intelligenria

incred,bilia f,ribe

nres b

orn–

pliceau,

6'

irrefol ubilem con ílanrcr nego·

&

ef-

ni

mendac

1j

fufpicione abfoluas:

Igitur

difcur

ficacicer

proba.

Nclcn

rJcionalc

quod

in

defi-

fiuum, vt

íic

prout

przci

!i.m

ab intclHlliuo,

po·

nitione

perfon•

i

Boerio

trldita ,

& \

niuerfo

tcft effe alia dífforcnria

f

ubaheroa,

quz

iunélL

Th ologorum

calculo probara

ponitur, non_,

curq

iorelleéliuo,vr

fic

abttcahenre

criam

ab

hu·

folum

coriue1¡it

homini,

fed eciam Deo,

&

An-

mano,

&

Angdico

pofiit cop{J;cuere Rationa-

gelis;

Efl

enim

perfona

Rationalis

n.1tur~

fodiuidua

k

humanum.

·

/ubft.Jn~

i• ~

Vb1 ly

Rational1s

non fumítur

pro m·

§.

•i·

lnfuper apud Scoriílas

rationale(fi

hoc

tellig n

te difcuríiuo , kcl falum pro ha

ben

te_,

termino

pr~cise

fignificas

inul/eEliuum

di/e

urfiNm)

pc:rfeélionem intellcaiui

prouc i11rellc;cliul1m...

competir eciam Angel

is,

quas

illi

di(currere

af–

abílrahit

a

difcurfiuo,

&.

OOCl

difcuríiuo,

Vt

do·

firmanc;adeo,vt

necdliuu fit

1

aliam ditfcrenc1afl\

e

. Thon1Js

1.p.

q~l2·

art.

3.

ad

4.

Dicendum

,

ftatuere

ad

hoc

vt

ad ho1ninem

oncrahatur,fci-

'luoct Deus

pou{l

dici

ration4lis nat11r.t

ferundu111

quod

licct ,

dependen$

4

phant

f

m~ribus.

Vodc

rriplex

r.tt10 non

im~ortat

difcurfu11t

,

fed

canttn~1'itcr

inttlli·

apuj

e

os rcl

ucebi

e formal

ir

as in

Ratiot1a/e

hu·

ibile~ natur~m. Vn~e

luc

notiane

non

foluni

mJno,

nempe

intelltf~1111tas

diffur/us

,

&

depcnden–

homo eft r

tionllis ·

fcd

etiam

Qeqs,

~

Ange.

tia

a

ph411ta/rn4te,

q

uod

apcrre foíf u

s

eLl

S or us

in

lus. Ergo

rJ ~ncdi ration~lc

in

ed

a1np

ituq10

primo

dillinll.3.q.~

.num.15.Nu//4

talis differentiff:

analogum Cic

ol

&

crtaturis,

tarnen

r

.'iont·

tfl.

inpma(ioquir,

&

lo

quicur de Ra

nonalir

tLJ,)

le

cr atum co1nrn 1ne

Angdis,

&

hoa1iuibu

quia m talt

contiuent11r

piures

re.i/itarcs

aliqu'

do

diflzn·

VlteciUS

JPtCrmitl.ilU

pa

aJiam grUdum

perfr•

fl~ tal

i

d1fiinflio Je,

TJe/

non

identitate,

qua/em

1fi.ti

i1'

élio·1is

dfentialis ad

1

ocninem: Erg

racional~

q.1.de

T1i1Jitate

2.difi.

e/fe in(er

rlfentiam,

&

propr

ie-

hom·nis

duos iam

dicit

inad~quatos con~eptus,

tatem p

erfon lem ve/

maiori ,/ic14t Aliase.r

lan"bitur;

gradum

fcilicec

i.uelleJit.d

in

ca

DlTIUili,

&

&

t11nc talis naturd

potefi cognofí

fecur.d1m1

al q"1d,hoc

_gradu~

conc_r

étiuu~1 ~fe~

modu.lll

1

vel

deter..

e/l

fec14nd·1m

¡¡!iq

uamrealuatrm,

&

perfcé/ionero

J

&

minauonem

rntellelt1U1tat1s

pcr d1ícurfum. pa

fecurtdurn

lil1

1 7u.im

ignorari,

&

ideo

talis

natu1F

<once·

iet

confcqucntia:

Nam

racio11ale

humu¡um.....

ptus rf

l.

fi

np

li&ite

r

fimplex.H,

lhnus

illc.

lg1cur

Ra·

non

folum dicir

inccllcJiuuai

\ngel1s

com-

rio11.ll

\!

humanum non

clt

diff·reuc1a

!l

tima..,,

mune; nec

di

í~u

ríiuu m b inrelkltiuo pra:ci-

íl rnpte

x,

&

irrefol

ubJl

1s, frd confl

ru

m quid

x

fum,

quo elt communc Brmis

p

r relbmati·

tot

conceocibus,

&

far

nalir~tibus

fub

lrern1s.

uam dif,urfenribus (ve docer S. Thorq.1s in

fra......

Ec

hic obiter

noc~u

ro c

ontrad

illion,·m

coti,

(iranaus)

ergo vrrun1ql1e dicir, feu ex

vrroqu

qui

in

Logjca

quxf

.7.de

Díffercnria docu:t, n

coalcfcir,

qu~

licec

rcal1tercum

ip(¡

,&

ínter

gdos

non

inrelJi

r

ecQm

di

ur

u,

id

·oque_,,

idc11Hihcc1unr,tamco n n

obllat eiufmodi re •

non

eífe

rHionaJ s,

niti

a!quiuoce:

Pr¡tere4

(in

}is

ind1uilihiti

as, quon11

Hl

intei' ·

~us

duas íbi

quíf)

ipf~

(ideíl:

int1.:Jlig'-'nt1a:)

fotel/tgr1n1

~nmple

4

formalllates

d1faiminct.

Probo íic.

ullun\

fine difcurf11:

nos vero cu

d1fcurf14,

vt

d1

it1'r

tertio

de

aliud

fuudamenturn

haber int lkllus

ad

diflin-

A

1ima,

&c.

Er )

li

j

neg

uir

fibi

onrr

nus

oucndas

du

s

forma\"tares

anim lis

~

rati

·n

2.d1fr.n

l.7..

1.114

l·S·

quod

lll

lzpe

facic.

fts in ho1ninei, nHi

quod \'idear,

a_ni~al

cf!'e

~

4

~

tionem

onucni

ndi

non

operauon1bus

ht

lJh–

bus cum aliis;non

vero

rationalc:fed

hoc

ipíum

exp ritur in rationali, in q uo

gradu

mt

lligcn·

di

ve

fic cfl ratio conucoicndi cum

ngelo, rn..

110

vero

int

lligt'ndi dtfcurfit e

dl

ra

10

ddfc.,

rendi aq "pío:

Ergo

ficut

in

vno

no

me

r

p rit

inrell~c.lus d~

sillas

formalit

t

,

fe

gradus

f.

fentiaks

anim~rs.

&

rationalis,

ica

in no rarro..

1ali

reperít

duo cti

Q1

1

ncmpc intclkéliu ·,

· i

fcurfiui

!

-

-

-

l?

R O

T

A S I S

AL

T E

~

A.

. 1

s~

A

~(ero

fecundo:

I~

definienda

f

pecie

infim

d

fcélu

d¡ffrrentiz

con

t·r·

tibili

cum

ipfa

qu~

cognofcíb1lis

non efl,

cius

lo

o

poffunt

oprim · du , vel

pJur s

diffi rcnme

(u altcrme

co~iungi,q u~

contl"tuenres

fpeci

m

rnfi

m z:i

JU

l

~t

d1ffi

r n

tict

f

p

cia1d1ima.!

·n

ogni z!

lt

e

rcff

doa.rina

i\rHlocd•s ,

qui

l1br