![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0535.jpg)
J.
n.
III.
IV.
I ND E X.
527
Q
U
JE
S T I O
III.
De IVlundi universi Systemate.
••••••.••. •
172.
U trum Systema Ptolemaicum sit admittendum..••
173•
Prop.
P tolem<ei hypothesis
l.
astronomicis observa–
tionibus , H.
&
Physicis principiis adversatur.. •
17r;.
Utrum Tychonica bypothesis Astronomi;.e ,
&
legibus
physicis consona
sít. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
78.
Prop.
I.
Quamquam Tycbonica hypothesis , admis-
sis orhitis e:llipticis ,
&
spiris , videatur faci-
le explicare siderum phcenomena;
II.
cum pby-
sicis
ta
men princípiis non satis congruit. . . . . •
180.
Utrum Systema Copernicanum admítti possit tanquam
thesis. . . . . . . . • . . • . • • . • . • . . . . • . . . . . .
1
84.
Prop.
Copernicanum Systema de motu tellu_ris,
&
immobilitate So1is
nullo modo potest defendi
tanquam tbesis••.. .. ..• ..... ..• •...•
I
87.
Utrum Copernicanum systema admitti possit tanquam
hypothesis. . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . • • . • • . . .• . .
204.
Prop.
l.
Systema Copernicanurn admitti potest ut
hypotbesis.
II.
non
qu;.e
sufficienter probet ph;.e–
nomena ccelestia.
111.
sed
qua!
position i jam fac-
ta: ostendat congruere consequentes
eífeci.us••• ibid.
Q
U
JE
S T 1 O
I X. • ·
De stellir
inerrantil1tts•
•••••••... • •.•.•••
207.
l .
Utrum Stellarum inerrantium certus sit numerus. . • ibid.
Prop.
l.
Quamquam definirr
a
nobis non -possit ·cer–
tus fixarum nume rus ;
ll.
is tamen non potest
esse infinitus ..•.•. . •••...••.. ..• .. .•
208.
lI.
Utrum constet de magnítudine fixarúm. . ... . •
216.
Prop.I.
St efüe fix;:e sunt terra Ionge maj0res.
II.
Ne-
quit tamen ostendi , eas vel ;:equare,
IlI.
vel
excedere Solis magnitudinem... .. .. •....•
2 19.
JII.
Utrum stell;.e fix::e lucem mutuen.tur
a
Sole•. ....
222.
Prop.
Facta bypothesi Copernicana , stellce
fix¿e
nonnisi: proprio fulgere lumine possunt , an au–
tem ita revera sit , non est hactenus demons-
trll.tum••••••••••• • •• •• • ••••• •••.•
224.
IV.